Score:2

Security of equal discrete logs (over different bases)

ru flag

I am trying to find a reduction for the following DLOG problem in generic groups. It is a simple generalization but I'm not finding any reference (the closest being the Chaum-Pedersen signature scheme sec 3.2, and BLS signatures without the hashing).

Let $G$ be a cyclic group, and $g, h$ generators. The problem is to find $y$ given $g^y, h^y$.

Looking for any insight or reference.

cn flag
Given $g$ and challenge Choose random $r$ such that $g^r$ is a generator. (Easy in prime order groups.) Set $h:=g^r$ and let $h^y := (g^y)^r$.
crypcrypcryp avatar
ru flag
OK, but how does that help the attacker in finding $y$ (or am I misreading your argument) EDIT: Oh, I got it, thanks.
cn flag
It doesn't. That's the point. It's a short description of the reduction from dlog to your problem. This reduction (described in more detail in Daniel S' answer below) shows that your problem is no easier than dlog.
Score:5
ru flag

This is equivalent to the discrete logarithm problem.

Clearly if I can solve the discrete logarithm problem, I can solve your problem.

Given an instance of the discrete logarithm problem e.g. given $x=g^y$ find $y$, I can generate an instance of your problem by choosing a random $r$ coprime to the group order and setting $h=g^r$. In this case I can also compute $x^r$ which will be $h^r$.

Thus if I can solve your problem, I can solve the discrete logarithm problem for the group.

crypcrypcryp avatar
ru flag
This assumes that the attacker can select $h$.
Daniel S avatar
ru flag
No, the randomisation of $r$ gives a random instance of your problem conditioned on one of the generators being $g$.
mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.