Score:0

Would a celestial cryptographic system be useful in practice?

in flag

I posted a question recently about whether a celestial body could be used in cryptography. I got many fantastic responses explaining how the celestial object could be used to generate a common reference string.

My follow up question is then: if it were possible and feasible to use a celestial object to allow two parties to communicate securely, would this only be of academic interest perhaps for government agencies? Or could it have advantages that would be more generally desirable for cryptography either now or in the future?

Maarten Bodewes avatar
in flag
Do you want to disregard the obvious & huge drawbacks - such as clouds - of doing so?
in flag
There is plenty of information you can get from astronomical objects which is not affected by clouds or the atmosphere. The practicalities are discussed in my other post, here I am more interested in whether there would be a need / demand for such a system *with the assumption* that the system works.
Paul Uszak avatar
cn flag
Can you clarify? Do you mean _"pactice"_, or _"physically possible?"_ I ask as you can get 10's kBits/hr out of the old `\dev\random` (yes the one without the `u`).
mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.