Score:0

Notation question: Dividing 2 Elliptic Curve Points producing a third point

ca flag

I'm working my way through some papers and ran across what seems to be division of two points that produce a third point. I'm new to ECC and am having a terrible time trying to figure out what this notation means, any thoughts?

enter image description here

This is from the BLS paper: https://crypto.stanford.edu/~dabo/pubs/papers/aggreg.pdf

Point division appears on pages

  • 6 (A potential attack on aggregate signatures)
  • 18 (Ring Signing equation)
kelalaka avatar
in flag
It is not ECC notation/ it is multiplicative group notation where the division exist!
David Rusu avatar
ca flag
@kelalaka I think I see! so does division here actually correspond to subtraction in the exponent? i.e. if A = g^a, B = g^b then A / B = g^(a-b) ?
poncho avatar
my flag
As I observed elsewhere, if we assume additive notation, then 'point division' corresponds to 'discrete log'. That is, if we set up the equation $x = A/B$, then this should be equivalent to $xB = A$, which is the discrete log of A to the base B - hence, it is well defined (if somewhat intractable to compute). Of course, this has nothing to do with the paper, which is written in multiplicative notation...
Score:0
ng flag

I don't see a point division.

I read $v_B=v'_B/v'_A$ as $v_B=v'_B\cdot({v'_A}^{-1})$ where $\cdot$ is the group law, and ${v'_A}^{-1}$ is the inverse of $v'_A$ in that group, that is such that ${v'_A}\cdot{v'_A}^{-1}={v'_A}^{-1}\cdot{v'_A}=1$, the group's neutral.

If the group was noted additively, that would be $v_B=v'_B-v'_A$, read as $v_B=v'_B+(-v'_A)$ where $-v'_A$ is the opposite of $v'_A$ in that group, that is such that ${v'_A}+(-v'_A)=(-v'_A)+{v'_A}=0$, the group's neutral.

David Rusu avatar
ca flag
Thanks! Yes this makes more sense. I'm a bit out of practice, but I'm starting to remember this now more clearly from university.
mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.