Score:1

What are those RSA Challenges, DES Challenges and RSA Factoring Challenges

gb flag

Can someone explain the differences between the DES challenge, the RSA challenges, and the RSA factoring challenge? What were the aims? I think the factoring challenge was to encourage research, the DES challenge was to show that 56-bit keys are too short. But how do the three challenges relate to each other?

kelalaka avatar
in flag
Welcome to Cryptography.SE. What did you search? And what is not clear from [RSA Factoring Challenge = RSA challenges](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_Factoring_Challenge) and [DES Challanges](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DES_Challenges) All started by the RSA Resaerch?
george s avatar
gb flag
what were the different aims of the three different challenges? according to Wikipedia the factoring challenge ran from 1991 to 2007, the RSA Secret-Key Challenge from 1997 to 2007 and the DES challenge from 1997 to 1999. The factoring challenge is clear: decompose semi-primes. What exactly did the other challenges demand?
kelalaka avatar
in flag
It is all written in Wikipedia: `The DES Challenges were a series of brute force attack contests created by RSA Security to highlight the lack of security provided by the Data Encryption Standard.`
george s avatar
gb flag
okay, understood. and the factoring challenge was supposed to find faster algorithms. What was the RSA Secret Key challenge?
kelalaka avatar
in flag
The top of it all. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_Secret-Key_Challenge
george s avatar
gb flag
thanks kelalaka. So, were the DES challenges based on 56-bit keys? Or on what length? The wikipedia article is pretty thin on what the challenge actually was and what tools were used for encryption.
Score:1
in flag

RSA labs set up Cryptographic Challenges*

All bolds are mine!

Various cryptographic challenges — including the RSA Factoring Challenge — served in the early days of commercial cryptography to measure the state of progress in practical cryptanalysis and reward researchers for the new knowledge they have brought to the community. Now that the industry has a considerably more advanced understanding of the cryptanalytic strength of common symmetric-key and public-key algorithms, these challenges are no longer active. The records, however, are presented here for reference by interested cryptographers.

  • RSA Laboratories’ secret-key challenges

    The goal of RSA Laboratories’ secret-key challenges was to quantify the security offered by the government-endorsed data encryption standard (DES) and other secret-key ciphers with keys of various sizes. The information obtained from these contests was of value to researchers and developers alike as they estimated the strength of algorithm sor applications against exhaustive key-search.

  • The RSA Factoring Challenge

    The RSA Challenge numbers are the kind we believe to be the hardest to factor; these numbers should be particularly challenging. These are the kind of numbers used in devising secure RSA cryptosystems.

    On the other hand, Wikipedia provides better then currently archive RSA web page

    The DES Challenges were a series of brute force attack contests created by RSA Security to highlight the lack of security provided by the Data Encryption Standard.

We have a question about on the details of DES challanges of RSA


* RSA labs purchased by EMC and all of the RSA links come from archives.

kelalaka avatar
in flag
If I'm missing something, could you let me know?
mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.