Score:3

What does the bounded storage model mean?

ie flag

In the bounded storage model, it assumes the storage of the adversary is bounded or limited, and thus it is possible that we can achieve a kind of cryptography without relying on hardness assumption. But what does it mean by "bounded storage"? Should it assume the length of the message is always too long for any computer on the earth to store? So can I conclude that the cryptographic scheme that replies on bounded storage model is not so efficient(if it is not very inefficient)? Since it should always send a very long message. And I think it is not compatible with blockchain(hard to imagine a very long message is stored on the blockchain). Am I right?

Reference: Simple Schemes in the Bounded Storage Model, Disappearing Cryptography in the Bounded Storage Model, Secure Multiparty Computation in the Bounded Storage Model, Speak Much, Remember Little: Cryptography in the Bounded Storage Model, Revisited

fgrieu avatar
ng flag
[edited] My very limited understanding of the bounded storage model is that it assumes adversaries have limited storage _for their intermediary calculations_, but lets normal users use feasibly little storage, and _aims_ (if not necessarily succeeds) to work with as normal/small size of messages as possible.
Ievgeni avatar
cn flag
Can you add sources/link where this expression appear to help us to understand the context?
fgrieu avatar
ng flag
@levgeni: about the only paper on the BSM that I attempted to read is Jiaxin Guan, Mark Zhandary: [_Simple Schemes in the Bounded Storage Model_](https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/507.pdf), in [proceedings of Eurocrypt 2019](https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17659-4_17).
mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.