Score:0

Could you provide the proof of a secure multi - secret sharing scheme that fulfils the requirements of correctness and information-theoretic privacy?

ua flag

Suppose that we have a multi-secret sharing scheme and let $I$ be the a set of agents. Say that $S$ is the space of the (uniform) random variables $s=(s_1,s_2,\cdots,s_I)\in S$ such that the share $s_1$ is known to $P_1$, $s_2$ is known to $P_2$ and so on.

According to Shamir's secret sharing, suppose that $\mathbb{F}$ is a finite field. This scheme makes use of the following general fact about polynomial interpolation: a polynomial of degree at most $t$ is completely determined by $t+1(<I)$ points on the polynomial. For example, two points determine a line, and three points determine a parabola. This general fact not only holds for the real numbers and complex numbers, but over any algebraic domain in which all non-zero elements have a multiplicative inverse (such a domain is called a field as it is defined above in its most generic situation).

$\textbf{Question:}$ Could anyone give the explicit mathematical structure and a proof of an appropriate multi secret sharing scheme where the requirements of correctness and information-theoretic privacy are fellfield?

Any references of the literature are very welcome! Also instead of using the polynomial formulation for the proofs I would appreciate it if you use the $+$ - modulo $q$ or the $\times$ - modulo $q$, where $q$ is the cardinal of the finite field $\mathbb{F}$.

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.