Score:0

Are there circuits that operate on plaintext, analogous to how FHE works?

ru flag

Fully Homomorphic Encryption lets us operate over encrypted data. Is there something analogous that let us operate over plaintexts directly, without knowing the circuit?

For example, let's say that I store AES of the user's password, and I want to be able to change the user's password to password +1 at my will without interacting with him. The user would be able to send me a circuit that decrypts the AES, adds +1 to the password, and re-encrypts it. The difference from FHE here is that I would be able to see the result AES(password+1) in plaintext, where in FHE I'd have the FHE(AES(password+1))

kelalaka avatar
in flag
This talks about circuits [Representing a function as FHE circuit](https://crypto.stackexchange.com/q/63781/18298). No, you can design an FHE protocol that, you will have still the AES encrypted password+1. It is quite costly, though. With a true FHE that has semantical security, you can execute almost all circuits with some huge cotst.
kelalaka avatar
in flag
In your case, why does the user has the AES key of the password?
kelalaka avatar
in flag
And [Can we proxy-re-encrypt using homomorphic encryption schemes?](https://crypto.stackexchange.com/q/9516/18298)
JAAAY avatar
us flag
Not sure if I totally understand your answer but maybe you want to check out the malleability property, however malleable ciphers aren't semantically secure.
Hilder Vitor Lima Pereira avatar
us flag
Obfuscation allows someone to run an unkown circuit on a known input and get the answer in clear. You can search for indistinguishability obfuscation, for example.
mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.