Score:3

How do we select values for parameters when using Differential Privacy?

uz flag

I'm aware we can quantify privacy with ε-differential privacy (ε-DP). But when we apply DP, how do we actually select the value for ε ? Are there some rule-of-thumbs? Is it decided case-by-case basis? In general, how do we decide we've enough privacy when using some algorithm that satisfies ε-DP definition?

Score:4
us flag

In the 2019 paper Differential Privacy in Practice: Expose Your Epsilons!, the authors Dwork, Kohli, Mulligan summarize the state of affairs thusly:

We found no clear consensus on how to choose ε, nor agreement on how to approach this and other key implementation decisions. Given the importance of these details there is a need for shared learning amongst the differential privacy community.

They propose an "Epsilon Registry" where applications of DP can specify their choice of ε. The closest to such a registry that I've been able to find is this list of real-world uses of DP by Damien Desfontaines, from Jan 2021.

I also found this very recent blog post from NIST which says "what, exactly, does ε mean, and how should we set it? Unfortunately, we still don’t have a consensus answer to this question", but then goes on to actually give some broad numerical guidance:

  • There is broad consensus that ε values in the low single digits (i.e. 0 < ε < 5) represent a conservative choice, and will provide strong privacy protection
  • Increasing experience with deployed systems suggests that larger ε values (i.e. 5 < ε < 20) also provide robust privacy protection in a variety of settings
  • In some contexts, even higher values of ε (i.e. ε > 20) may still provide meaningful privacy protection, but more experience is needed to understand this setting
SpiderRico avatar
uz flag
Thank you! Very helpful resources.
mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.