Score:0

Why some people said we should use Asymmetric key to cipher the weak Symmetric key?

us flag

I heard from some people that create a software licensing. They need to generate a short license number format. So if they use RSA (Asymmetric) they will got long key. Also if they use AES (Symmetric). It have only single key. Which can decrypted by attacker and he use it to generate/create KeyGens tool.

So I heard from one of them he said he use Asymmetric to secure the Symmetric Key.... I know what he mean. But in application I think RSA public key will stored. so the symmetric key will be known when decrypt the Symmetric Key variable which maybe saved in resources or something.

I think this is not give more secure to symmetric key. after it decrypted with public key (RSA), Attacker will generate keygens easily. So what the benefits of doing that? Or what they actually try to do with this idea?

fgrieu avatar
ng flag
In most contexts, "decrypted with public key" is a confusion. A public key is not intended to be used to decrypt (because it's public, thus using it in this way goes against the goal of keeping what's encrypted secret). A public key is intended to encrypt something (that will be decrypted with a matching private key), or to verify a signature (that was produced using a matching private key). Perhaps "use Asymmetric to secure the Symmetric Key" means _signing_ the symmetric secret key. Or perhaps it really means _encrypting_; that would be security by obscurity (common in software licensing).
mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.