Score:0

Does the security margin of Kalyna block cipher double per for additional 4 rounds? Would be possible to create a version of it with larger key sizes?

pf flag

I believe this question should be directed to the authors of Kalyna block cipher, but I think they cannot answer me because of the war they are facing in their country actually.

I know that AES uses this criteria for adjusting the rounds in accord to different key sizes: [key size]/32+6

Kalyna block cipher has 10 rounds for 128-bits of key size, 14 for 256-bits and 18 for 512-bits. I can see that for each duplication in the key size, four additional rounds are added. am I right or is there other criteria for calculating the additional rounds per increase in key lenght in Kalyna block cipher?

Another question:

Is it possible to create a version of Kalyna block cipher with larger key sizes such as 1024 or 2048-bits? I'm not a cryptographer (neither a good English reader) and I don't know how to read C code (there is reference implementations of this cipher along the Internet).

IF was possible to create modified versions of Kalyna with larger key sizes, should I add 4 rounds per each duplication in the key size based on fact that Kalyna uses four additional rounds per duplication in the key length in its official version?

SAI Peregrinus avatar
si flag
Symmetric key sizes over 256 bits are a sign of an incompetent designer. They provide no practical security increase, only a performance decrease. Poor performance often leads to people omitting encryption entirely, so it can be a security decrease.
phantomcraft avatar
pf flag
@SAIPeregrinus Well, Threefish has a key size up to 1024-bits and is yet quite fast and secure.
mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.