Score:0

Data encryption or Blockchain in data sharing between *multiple* sources?

cn flag

imagine several parties that own data, and some of them need to use data of other parties, but have only limited access rights to it. An example:

Party #1 (pharmacy store) needs confirmation from Party #2 (doctor) that Party #3 (patient) was prescribed a medicine, but Party #1 (pharmacy store) shouldn't know the name of Party #3 (patient). Party #4 (drug manufacturer) needs to know when Party #1 (pharmacy store) has sold a medicine, how much was sold, and the address of the pharmacy store.

So there are 2 types of data in these scenarios: 1) general "Yes/No" confirmation [was the drug prescribed?], 2) specific data (e.g. prescription validity deadline date, quantity, address, etc.) Which technology (or the combination of technologies?) do you recommend for the above-mentioned? I have the following in mind so far:

  1. Zero Knowledge Proof blockchain (seems suitable for at least "general Yes/No" data requests)
  2. Homomorphic encryption (looks like a better solution for data, which supposes further calculations [e.g. summarizing sales of all drug stores in a given month] and/or for bigger volumes of data - to not overload the blockchain with high-volume transactions)
  3. Secure multi-party computation (seems very similar to Homomorphic ecryption for me, but I'm not sure, so will be great if you can explain the difference between those two)

Thank you for your comments!

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.