Score:3

Semantic Security equivalent to Real/Random Semantic Security

ru flag

I'm reading Boneh and Shoup's book "A Graduate Course in Applied Cryptography." Im doing one of the questions at the end of the stream ciphers chapter. I'm not sure how to do this problem:

Let $\mathcal{E} = (E,D)$ be a cipher defined over $\mathcal{K}, \mathcal{M}, \mathcal{C}$. Assume that one can efficiently generate messages from the message space $\mathcal{M}$ at random. We define an attack game between an adversary $\mathcal{A}$ and a challenger as follows. The adversary selects a message $m \in \mathcal{M}$ and sends $m$ to the challenger. The challenger computes $$b \leftarrow \{0,1\}, k \leftarrow \mathcal{K}, m_0 \leftarrow m, m_1 \xleftarrow{\\\$} \mathcal{M}, c \leftarrow E(k,m_b)$$ and sends the cipher text $c$ to $\mathcal{A}$ who then computes and outputs a bit $\hat{b}$. Define $\mathcal{A}$'s advantage to be $|Pr[\hat{b} = b] - 1/2]|$ and we say $\mathcal{E}$ is real/random secure if this advantage is negligible for all efficient adversaries.

My attempt:

For one direction, let $\mathcal{E}$ be semantically secure and let $B$ be a real/random adversary. We construct a semantic security adversary $\mathcal{A}$ with $B$ as a subroutine.

$\mathcal{A}$ selects $m_0, m_1 \in \mathcal{M}$ as per the semantic security game. The challenger responds, sending $\mathcal{A}$ $E(k, m_b)$ with $b$ chosen at random to be $0$ or $1$. Now $\mathcal{A}$ plays the role of challenger to $B$, and sends inputs $m_0$ and $c$ to $B$. (Intuitively $\mathcal{A}$ is asking $B$ if $c$ is an encryption of $m_0$ or some other random message). With these inputs, $B$ outputs a bit $\hat{b}$. $\mathcal{A}$ outputs what $B$ outputs.

I don't know how to relate $\mathcal{A}$'s semantic security advantage to $B$'s real/random semantic security advantage. And I am not sure how to construct a real/random adversary using a semantic security adversary for the other direction.

Thank you for any help!

I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.