Score:1

How effective is increasing elliptic curve modulo sizes for quantum resistance?

es flag

From info provided by Google:

  1. Lattice based key pair and signature sizes are roughly 12/2 kb and 9 kb, which is much larger than 256-bit ECC key sizes.
  2. The number of q-bits need to break n-bit ECC can be 6n, but it's also affected by some other factors.
  3. The difficulty level for adding more q-bits to a computer increase exponentially.

Since there could be a long time until humanity builds the 2000+ q-bit quantum computers, how effective is it to elliptic curve modulo sizes, (the corresponding key sizes would still be much smaller than lattice based key sizes), to prolong its usage?

Score:1
my flag
  1. Lattice based key pair and signature sizes are roughly 12/2 kb and 9 kb, which is much larger than 256-bit ECC key sizes.

I assume that you mean the public key sizes are 1.5kbyte. Actually, Falcon-512 (which is what you'd use if you're really interested in minimizing sizes) has 897 byte public keys and 666 byte signatures; just somewhat larger than RSA sizes.

  1. The number of q-bits need to break n-bit ECC can be 6n, but it's also affected by some other factors.

I believe the number is actually slightly more; however it's close enough for estimating purposes (and I believe performance can be increased significantly by having a few more qubits available)

  1. The difficulty level for adding more q-bits to a computer increase exponentially.

That, no one knows. It may be that once we get real logical (error correcting) qubits, that the difficulty of adding more is significantly less than what we have experienced so far (then again, it might not - or, there might be other difficulties we run into that we haven't yet)

If adding a few more qubits doubled the complexity, then you are right, Quantum Computers are not a cryptographical concern. However, that is not a security assumption that many of us are happy to make.

I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.