Score:1

Are you aware of cryptographic contexts (e.g., post-quantum) in which a square root $\sqrt{\cdot}$ must be computed in constant time?

id flag

Let $\mathbb{F}_q$ be a finite field of odd characteristic. I know that a constant-time implementation of the square root extraction $\sqrt{\cdot} \in \mathbb{F}_q$ is used in the context of hashing to elliptic curves (see Appendix I of the draft).

Are you aware of other cryptographic contexts in which a square root $\sqrt{\cdot}$ must be computed in constant time to be protected against timing attacks? What about post-quantum cryptography for example?

Possibly, I have an idea of how to invent a new deterministic square root algorithm, which is much faster than Tonelli-Shanks's one over a highly 2-adic field $\mathbb{F}_q$. Therefore, I would like to understand the potential real-world applications of my research.

Score:2
ru flag

I'm not sure what you mean by a highly 2-adic field, but Patterson's decoding algorithm for binary Goppa codes requires the extraction of a square root in a field of characteristic 2. This is an important part of the decryption process in the classic McEliece post-quantum algorithm and where a variable time algorithm could potentially leak secret information.

Dimitri Koshelev avatar
id flag
By a highly $2$-adic field I mean a field $\mathbb{F}_{\!q}$ such that $2^\nu \mid q-1$ for a quite large $\nu \in \mathbb{N}$. Is this the case in your example if we consider an odd field characteristic ? Do you mean finding a root of the polynomial $x^2 + x + 1$ in your example ? As is known, in even characteristic the root of $x^2 + 1$ can be found fairly easily. Hence, my question has nothing to do with the given situation.
mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.