Score:3

Variant of CCA security for Paillier with blinded decryption oracle

ad flag

Consider a variant of the Paillier encryption scheme where the message space is restricted to $\mathbb{Z}_q$ such that the RSA modulus $N$ of the Paillier cryptosystem satisfies $N > q + q^2$. I am interested in the following variant of the CCA security game where the decryption oracle answers with not a complete decryption of the requested ciphertext but with an integer blinding of it:

  • $\mathcal{C}: pk, sk \leftarrow \mathsf{Keygen}(1^{\lambda})$. Give $pk$ to $\mathcal{A}$.
  • $\mathcal{C}:$ Choose $b \xleftarrow{\\\$} \{0,1\}$.
  • Encryption queries:
    • $\mathcal{A}:$ Give $m_{0_i},m_{1_i} \in \mathbb{Z}_q$ to $\mathcal{C}$.
    • $\mathcal{C}:$ $c_i \leftarrow \mathsf{Enc}(pk, m_{b_i})$. Give $c_i$ to $\mathcal{A}$.
  • Blinded decryption queries:
    • $\mathcal{A}:$ Give ciphertext $c' \neq c_i$ for any $i$ to $\mathcal{C}$.
    • $\mathcal{C}:$ $m' \leftarrow \mathsf{Dec}(sk, c')$; $r \xleftarrow{\\\$} \mathbb{Z}_{q^2}$; $\tilde{m}' \leftarrow m' + r \mod N$. Give $\tilde{m}'$ to $\mathcal{A}$.
  • $\mathcal{A}:$ Output $b' \in \{0,1\}$ as its guess of $b$.

My question is whether the above notion of security holds for the above variant of the Paillier encryption scheme? Intuitively, it appears that for any ciphertext encrypting a message in the valid message space $\mathbb{Z}_q$, the decryption oracle does not provide any useful information to the adversary. However, I am not sure whether the ability to obtain blinded decryptions of messages outside the valid message space helps the adversary or not.

Could someone please provide pointers towards either an attack or a proof of security? Thanks.

I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.