Score:1

How can we explain STARK with less math?

gq flag

I am trying to understand STARK with not much math. I understand SNARK like this: Computation → Arithmetic Circuit → R1CS → QAP → zk-SNARK

From the helpful article: https://z.cash/technology/zksnarks/

We have a computation with many steps that can prove something. We take that and create an arithmetic circuit (in simple words a algebraic equation). Then we have R1CS which is going to validate each of the steps were done correctly. Then we combine all these checks in to one with QAP (Quadratic Arithmetic Program - can be compared to converting an algebraic equation to a line or graph in 2D Space). This gives you a SNARK.

How can we similarly describe STARK?

et flag
R1CS & QAP isn't mandatory in SNARKs. PLONK has neither. That's there in older SNARKs like Pinocchio & Groth16
I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.