Score:0

Utility Guarantee of Small Data Base Mechanism in Differential Privacy

vi flag

I am reading Section 4.1 (An offline algorithm: SmallDB) of The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy by Dwork and Roth. I am stuck at the proof of Proposition 4.4, which is about the utility guarantee of the small database mechanism (Algorithm 4 in page 70).

Proposition 4.4. Let $\mathcal{Q}$ be any class of linear queries. Let $y$ be the database output by SmallDB($x,\mathcal{Q},\epsilon,\alpha$). Then with probability $1-\beta$: $$ \max_{f\in\mathcal{Q}}|f(x)-f(y)|\le\alpha+\frac{2\left(\frac{\log|\mathcal{X}|\log|\mathcal{Q}|}{\alpha^2}+\log\left(\frac{1}{\beta}\right)\right)}{\epsilon\|x\|_1}. $$ Proof. Applying the utility bounds for the exponential mechanism (Theorem 3.11) with $\Delta u=\frac{1}{\|x\|_1}$ and $\text{OPT}_q(x)\le\alpha$ (which follows from Theorem 4.2), we find: $$ \Pr\left[\max_{f\in\mathcal{Q}}|f(x)-f(y)|\ge\alpha+\frac{2}{\epsilon\|x\|_1}\left(\log|\mathcal{R}|+t\right)\right]\le e^{-t}. $$

Here $\mathcal{R}=\{y\in\mathbb{N}^{|\mathcal{X}|}:\|y\|_1=\log|\mathcal{Q}|/\alpha^2\}$ is the collection of small databases, and $u:\mathbb{N}^{|\mathcal{X}|}\times\mathcal{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ is given by $$ u(x,y)=-\max_{f\in\mathcal{Q}}|f(x)-f(y)|, $$ which measures the similarity between an arbitrary database $x$ and a small database $y\in\mathcal{R}$.

My question: Why is $\Delta u=1/\|x\|_1$? According to page 38, $\Delta u$ is defined by $$ \Delta u=\max_{y\in\mathcal{R}}\max_{\|x-x'\|_1\le 1}|u(x,y)-u(x',y)|, $$ so $\Delta u$ should not depend on the size of any database $x$.

I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.