Score:1

Interpolating polynomial discrete log

es flag

This is taken from page 16 of Stacking Sigmas

Essentially, let $0<t<\ell$ be integer values smaller than a certain prime modulus $q$. We have a set $\mathcal{X}$ with $|\mathcal{X}|=\ell-t+1$, $[k]:=\{1,2,\ldots,k\}$ and $[k]_0:=[k]\cup0$. For a given set $A\subset\mathbb{Z}_q$, define the polynomials $$f_A(X)=\sum_{i\in A}y_i\cdot L_{(A,i)}(X)$$ where $L_{(A,i)}$ is the Lagrange polynomial over A at the $i$ value, i.e. $L_{(A,i)}(i)=1$ and $L_{(A,i)}(j)=0$ for all $j\in A\setminus\{i\}$.

With all this in mind they make the observation that for all $j\in\mathcal{X}$, $f_\mathcal{X}(j)=f_{[\ell]_0}(j)$, which is correct, but SOMEHOW, this implies that $f_\mathcal{X}=f_{[\ell-t]_0}$ "since both are degree $\ell-t<|\mathcal{X}|$ polynomials".

Then there is one more step and the proof is done, both I don't understand how is that those polynomials are the same, I agree that they have the same degree but I don't see how this implies the equality.

Thanks!

Score:0
sa flag

A polynomial of degree $d$ is uniquely determined if it is specified at $d+1$ points. A linear polynomial is uniquely determined if specified at two points. The Lagrange interpolation is just the mechanism for determining the polynomial.

Take $d=\ell -t,$ and note that $\mid {\cal X} \mid =\ell-t+1,$ and that the two polynomials match over the set ${\cal X}.$

Cristian Baeza avatar
es flag
Of course, could you provide a bit more detail on how the match over $\mathcal{X}$?? That's the only part I'm stuck. My calculations show otherwise.
I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.