Score:1

On real-time decryption of encrypted radio communications

id flag

According to Jack Watling & Nick Reynolds,

Ukrainian officers recalled one incident in which the Russian headquarters gave pre-emptive warning to its units of an artillery strike based on Ukrainian troops calling in a fire mission. The Ukrainian troops were communicating with Motorola radios with 256-bit encryption, but it appeared that the Russians were able to capture and decrypt these transmissions in near real time. The most likely system for such functions is the Torn-MDM.

Source: Jack Watling, Nick Reynolds, Meatgrinder: Russian tactics in the second year of its invasion of Ukraine, Royal United Services Institute, 19 May 2023.


This claim is discussed on Hacker News, where it is claimed that the aforementioned radios are Project 25 (P25) radios using 256-bit AES.

Since I find it hard to believe that anyone can decrypt 256-bit AES in "near real time", I assume that – excluding the possibility that old-fashioned HUMINT is to blame — some design or implementation weaknesses are being exploited. Perhaps some of these weaknesses have been published in academic (rather than military) publications. References would be most welcome.


Related

Morrolan avatar
ng flag
Doesn't really answer what you asked for, so I'll put it here: There is, of course, the real possibility that one of the communicating parties just happened to be sending in plaintext. A rather famous problem of many P25-compatible radios, which seems to happen more frequently than one would be inclined to believe - see e.g. this talk by Matt Blaze: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7awwG9aaR4c
Maarten Bodewes avatar
in flag
There are many possibilities here; brute forcing AES is obviously not one of them. AES being cracked is very unlikely as well. The most simple one is human intelligence; having the key or a captured listening device would be much more obvious. Then there are side channels (frequency analysis), bad implementations and whatnot to worry about.
I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.