Score:0

storing and orchestrating geographically distributed files

jp flag

Could somebody explain how corporations like facebook and instagram (or literary anyone who stores the user data) technically handle storage of EU citizen data in Europe?

I am building a website that will allow users to upload their pictures and videos and share them with friends. As per GDPR regulation - all data that identifies EU citizens should be stored and processed in EU. So for example if I upload the picture and there is my face in it - then the data is supposed to be stored in EU.

Does this technically mean that we have to use multiple clusters of distributed file systems (example: GlusterFS) for this task? For example:

  • first cluster - non EU
  • second cluster in EU

then we mount the filesystems under following directories:

  • /mnt/eu_data
  • /mnt/else

and when the data is saved it goes either to one server or the other. I find it hard to believe that this is the solution to the problem. Imagine if the US GoogleDrive user migrates to EU, so now google has to migrate xx gigagytes of data to Europe.. Given that all files have the metadata associated with them somewhere in DB - it means that this DB also has to be updated at the same time as data is migrated. Goodbye ACID principles.

Is there perhaps some kind of labeling mechanism that allows distributed file systems to auto-shuffle the data depending on the filename? For example if the file is named us_myimage.png it goes to the server (or a server group) with us label and if I later rename the file to eu_myimage.png then the file is re-balanced to the server with eu label?

I have looked into some of the existing solutions like GlusterFS and minio but could not find any leads. The closest solution to this problem is implemented by mongodb through GridFS, where you could shuffle the data between clusters based on labels.. In my case I am interested in file system storage solution.

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.