Score:-1

raspberry pi - no ethernet connection on unrelated IPv6 change in router

br flag

My raspberry pi is reachable via Putty at 192.168.0.112. As soon as I change IPv6 settings in the router from DHCP-PD enabled to disabled (because I am trying to understand of IPv6 works), I can no longer connect to the pi. The pi is even not showing up when I scan the full subnet 192.168.0.0/24. The router has DHCP (IPv4) enabled, but the pi has a manually assigned static ip.

How might this be related?

Here is the output of ip addr show eth0 of my pi:

eth0: flags=4675<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,ALLMULTI,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        inet 192.168.0.110  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.0.255
        inet6 XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX::11f8  prefixlen 128  scopeid 0x0<global>
        inet6 fe80::ba27:ebff:febb:cccd  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>
        ether b8:27:eb:bb:cc:cd  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 2669  bytes 306878 (299.6 KiB)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 528  bytes 123539 (120.6 KiB)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

enter image description here

Score:1
cn flag

Not related. Static IP addresses on a host are unaffected by DHCP settings on the router's WAN interfaces.

Further, DHCPv6 is different from DHCPv4. They are separate protocols.

Try using IPv6 only to connect to the host. You already have an address. Consider adding a known address via such mechanisms as EUI-64 or static host identifier aka ip token on Linux.

Should v4 be required, do packet capture on both source and destination hosts, and analyze to see what is happening.

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.