Score:0

HPACUCLI shows logical drives not available. How to fix it?

mx flag

since I need to copy some data from an old HP DL380 server, I decided to power on it after a long time. Unfortunately, I can't mount the RAID5 logical volume that is containing the data I need.

So, in order to better investigate, I started using HPACUCLI tool and I noticed that the logical drive #1 is not available (but hard disks are ok). Do you know what does it mean and how I can fix it (if I can fix it...).

Many thanks in advance. Mauro

[root@dl380 ~]# hpacucli HP Array Configuration Utility CLI 9.20.9.0 Detecting Controllers...Done. Type "help" for a list of supported commands. Type "exit" to close the console.

=> ctrl all show config

Smart Array P410i in Slot 0 (Embedded) (sn: 500143801862EA40)

array A (SAS, Unused Space: 0 MB)

  logicaldrive 1 (279.4 GB, RAID 1, OK)

  physicaldrive 1I:1:1 (port 1I:box 1:bay 1, SAS, 300 GB, OK)
  physicaldrive 1I:1:2 (port 1I:box 1:bay 2, SAS, 300 GB, OK)

SEP (Vendor ID PMCSIERA, Model SRC 8x6G) 250 (WWID: 500143801862EA4F)

Smart Array P411 in Slot 2 (sn: PACCTID12081FLZ)

array A (SATA, Unused Space: 0 MB)

  logicaldrive 1 (30.0 TB, RAID 5, Not Available)

  physicaldrive 1E:1:1 (port 1E:box 1:bay 1, SATA, 3 TB, OK)
  physicaldrive 1E:1:2 (port 1E:box 1:bay 2, SATA, 3 TB, OK)
  physicaldrive 1E:1:3 (port 1E:box 1:bay 3, SATA, 3 TB, OK)
  physicaldrive 1E:1:4 (port 1E:box 1:bay 4, SATA, 3 TB, OK)
  physicaldrive 1E:1:5 (port 1E:box 1:bay 5, SATA, 3 TB, OK)
  physicaldrive 1E:1:6 (port 1E:box 1:bay 6, SATA, 3 TB, OK)
  physicaldrive 1E:1:7 (port 1E:box 1:bay 7, SATA, 3 TB, OK)
  physicaldrive 1E:1:8 (port 1E:box 1:bay 8, SATA, 3 TB, OK)
  physicaldrive 1E:1:9 (port 1E:box 1:bay 9, SATA, 3 TB, OK)
  physicaldrive 1E:1:10 (port 1E:box 1:bay 10, SATA, 3 TB, OK)
  physicaldrive 1E:1:11 (port 1E:box 1:bay 11, SATA, 3 TB, OK)
  physicaldrive 1E:1:12 (port 1E:box 1:bay 12, SATA, 3 TB, OK)
mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.