Score:-4

Not getting faster Internet speed after aggregation of two Verizon gateways

is flag

I want to increase Internet speed by using two Internet gateways instead of one.

I have two Verizon home-Internet-LTE gateways.

Both are connected to a TP LINK TL-SG116 Switch, which has IEEE802.3ab (link aggregation) and also 802.3 802.3i 802.3u 802.3x 802.1p

But, laptop plugged to switch only gets ~55 Mbps download speed, with both gateways.

With one Verizon gateway, laptop sees ~55 Mbps.

I have cycled power.
Each Verizon gateway by itself does ~55 Mbps down and ~6 up.

With link aggregation, I hoped to see near double speed.

Score:4
ar flag

You cannot aggregate links in the way you attempt to do.

First of all:

  • 802.3ab is Gigabit Ethernet. It's not a aggregation protocol.
  • 802.3i is 10Mb Ethernet.
  • 802.3u is 100Mb Ethernet.
  • 802.3x is Full Duplex 100Mb Ethernet
  • 802.3p is not a recognized standard.

None of the stuff you mention your switch supports is even remotely relevant for aggregation. Especially not aggregation at L3.

Your switch is a standard stupid L2 switch. It has zero management features as far as I can tell, and can simply not aggregate bandwidth from two different L3 devices. When you connect both to your switch, it's basically a round robin selection, where your computer will use either randomly depending on which router was the quickest to answer to your DHCP request. The other will be completely idle.

You need a layer three device to aggregate L3 traffic. That is a router.

There's generally different ways of doing this:

  • A SD-WAN configuration where you have some remote end that merge the two flows, so it will look like one pipe to the outside world.

  • Round robin, where network stream A will be sent to modem #1, and network stream B to modem #2, and so forth.

  • Different clients go to different devices, e.g. computer A -> Modem #1.

In addition the setup is complicated by the fact that it's LTE. The waves is a shared medium, so it's not a given that it's more efficient (or higher performance) with two radios competing for airtime. A single, faster, radio may be a better solution, as it won't have to coordinate with other radios to the same extent.

In short: to aggregate you need different equipment, and if you want one network stream to be split across multiple WAN gateways, you need a computer with fast connectivity somewhere on the internet that can merge those two streams for you.

Switches that support aggregation do so between two Ethernet switches that support aggregation. They will not provide any aggregation over a L3 connection, as LACP is not made for that purpose.

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.