Score:-2

Bind: (Reverse) zone not loaded due to errors

nu flag

Using Ubuntu Server and bind9...

Here's the error: enter image description here

Direct zone: enter image description here

Reverse zone: enter image description here

Named.conf.local: enter image description here

Named.conf.options: enter image description here

When i do the checkconf and the checkzones it says everything is good, basically... But when i try to nslookup an IP it fails. Fortunately, it does not happens with the direct resolution... Please help!

diya avatar
la flag
Welcome to Server Fault! Please use copy-paste and avoid posting screenshots of text when posting console output / settings. Format that text as "`code`" using [Markdown](https://serverfault.com/editing-help) and/or the formatting options in the edit menu to properly type-set your posts. That improves readability, attracts better answers and allows indexing by search engines, which may help people with similar questions.
Score:0
la flag

You can (manually) check the syntax of a zone file with the named-checkzone command. Which is also what currently happens during bind start-up and generates a fault.

For the reverse zone that generates the error use for example

named-checkzone 12.168.192.in-addr.arpa. etc/bind/db.12.168.192.in-addr.arpa.

That will show you the complete error messages that prevent Bind from loading that zone.

I suspect that the problem is in how you're attempting to use short hostnames as FQDN's. Generally any resource record that ends in a trailing . dot is considered a FQDN and the FQDN's you entered in the reverse zone such as ubuntusymme. simply do not exist (those should probably read and match the forward FQDN's you defined, so : ubuntusymme.inglan.net. )

I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.