Score:0

How to support TLS 1 and TLS 1.1 with haproxy 2.4 and OpenSSL 3?

cn flag

I am trying to support TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1 with haproxy 2.4.18 (and OpenSSL 3.0.2) on Ubuntu 22.04.

I have followed Mozilla SSL Configuration Generator, "Old" configuration, slightly modified, adding :@SECLEVEL=1 and ssl-min-ver TLSv1.0

  ssl-default-bind-ciphers ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305\
:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA384:ECD\
HE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256:AES128-GCM-SHA256:AES256-GCM-SHA384:AES128-SHA256:AES256-SHA256:AES128-SHA:AES256-SHA:DES-CBC\
3-SHA:@SECLEVEL=1
    ssl-default-bind-ciphersuites TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
    ssl-default-bind-options ssl-min-ver TLSv1.0 no-tls-tickets

    ssl-default-server-ciphers ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY13\
05:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA384:E\
CDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256:AES128-GCM-SHA256:AES256-GCM-SHA384:AES128-SHA256:AES256-SHA256:AES128-SHA:AES256-SHA:DES-C\
BC3-SHA:@SECLEVEL=1
    ssl-default-server-ciphersuites TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
    ssl-default-server-options ssl-min-ver TLSv1.0 no-tls-tickets

This is the error that I get:

$ openssl s_client -connect myserver.com:443 -tls1_1
CONNECTED(00000003)
40770031637F0000:error:0A000438:SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:tlsv1 alert internal error:../ssl/record/rec_layer_s3.c:1584:SSL alert number 80
---
no peer certificate available
---
No client certificate CA names sent
---
SSL handshake has read 7 bytes and written 127 bytes
Verification: OK
---
New, (NONE), Cipher is (NONE)
Secure Renegotiation IS NOT supported
Compression: NONE
Expansion: NONE
No ALPN negotiated
SSL-Session:
    Protocol  : TLSv1.1
    Cipher    : 0000
    Session-ID: 
    Session-ID-ctx: 
    Master-Key: 
    PSK identity: None
    PSK identity hint: None
    SRP username: None
    Start Time: 1676996842
    Timeout   : 7200 (sec)
    Verify return code: 0 (ok)
    Extended master secret: no
---

On the server, haproxy log reports a "SSL handshake failure".

And this is haproxy -vv output, apparently with support for TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1:

# haproxy -vv
HAProxy version 2.4.18-0ubuntu1.2 2023/02/13 - https://haproxy.org/
Status: long-term supported branch - will stop receiving fixes around Q2 2026.
Known bugs: http://www.haproxy.org/bugs/bugs-2.4.18.html
Running on: Linux 5.15.0-60-generic #66-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 20 14:29:49 UTC 2023 x86_64
Build options :
  TARGET  = linux-glibc
  CPU     = generic
  CC      = cc
  CFLAGS  = -O2 -g -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wall -Wextra -Wdeclaration-after-statement -fwrapv -Wno-address-of-packed-member -Wno-unused-label -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-clobbered -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-cast-function-type -Wtype-limits -Wshift-negative-value -Wshift-overflow=2 -Wduplicated-cond -Wnull-dereference
  OPTIONS = USE_PCRE2=1 USE_PCRE2_JIT=1 USE_OPENSSL=1 USE_LUA=1 USE_SLZ=1 USE_SYSTEMD=1 USE_PROMEX=1
  DEBUG   = 

Feature list : +EPOLL -KQUEUE +NETFILTER -PCRE -PCRE_JIT +PCRE2 +PCRE2_JIT +POLL -PRIVATE_CACHE +THREAD -PTHREAD_PSHARED +BACKTRACE -STATIC_PCRE -STATIC_PCRE2 +TPROXY +LINUX_TPROXY +LINUX_SPLICE +LIBCRYPT +CRYPT_H +GETADDRINFO +OPENSSL +LUA +FUTEX +ACCEPT4 -CLOSEFROM -ZLIB +SLZ +CPU_AFFINITY +TFO +NS +DL +RT -DEVICEATLAS -51DEGREES -WURFL +SYSTEMD -OBSOLETE_LINKER +PRCTL -PROCCTL +THREAD_DUMP -EVPORTS -OT -QUIC +PROMEX -MEMORY_PROFILING

Default settings :
  bufsize = 16384, maxrewrite = 1024, maxpollevents = 200

Built with multi-threading support (MAX_THREADS=64, default=8).
Built with OpenSSL version : OpenSSL 3.0.2 15 Mar 2022
Running on OpenSSL version : OpenSSL 3.0.2 15 Mar 2022
OpenSSL library supports TLS extensions : yes
OpenSSL library supports SNI : yes
OpenSSL library supports : TLSv1.0 TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2 TLSv1.3
Built with Lua version : Lua 5.3.6
Built with the Prometheus exporter as a service
Built with network namespace support.
Built with libslz for stateless compression.
Compression algorithms supported : identity("identity"), deflate("deflate"), raw-deflate("deflate"), gzip("gzip")
Built with transparent proxy support using: IP_TRANSPARENT IPV6_TRANSPARENT IP_FREEBIND
Built with PCRE2 version : 10.39 2021-10-29
PCRE2 library supports JIT : yes
Encrypted password support via crypt(3): yes
Built with gcc compiler version 11.3.0

Available polling systems :
      epoll : pref=300,  test result OK
       poll : pref=200,  test result OK
     select : pref=150,  test result OK
Total: 3 (3 usable), will use epoll.

Available multiplexer protocols :
(protocols marked as <default> cannot be specified using 'proto' keyword)
              h2 : mode=HTTP       side=FE|BE     mux=H2       flags=HTX|CLEAN_ABRT|HOL_RISK|NO_UPG
            fcgi : mode=HTTP       side=BE        mux=FCGI     flags=HTX|HOL_RISK|NO_UPG
              h1 : mode=HTTP       side=FE|BE     mux=H1       flags=HTX|NO_UPG
       <default> : mode=HTTP       side=FE|BE     mux=H1       flags=HTX
            none : mode=TCP        side=FE|BE     mux=PASS     flags=NO_UPG
       <default> : mode=TCP        side=FE|BE     mux=PASS     flags=

Available services : prometheus-exporter
Available filters :
    [SPOE] spoe
    [CACHE] cache
    [FCGI] fcgi-app
    [COMP] compression
    [TRACE] trace

Why is this not working and how can I fix it? Thanks!

I know these are obsolete protocols but I would like to support users that have old browsers for whatever reason.

Score:4
cl flag

With OpenSSL 3.0.1 they (rightfully) moved TLS 1.0 and 1.1 to security level 0, because they're utterly useless and insecure. It's a horrible idea to support these protocols, it's actually worse than plain HTTP, since it gives you a false sense of security. In your cipher suite generator, you're using SECLEVEL 1, which clearly ain't gonna fly with these protocols anymore.

TLS 1.2 support has been added to pretty much all browsers almost 10 years ago. Why on Earth would you want to support clients more than a decade old? Infosec is not a matter of "whatever reason". Especially if it renders your HTTP security completely breakable.

On my sites, even TLS 1.2 usage was so low (3% maybe) a year ago that I just went ahead and bumped the requirement to TLS 1.3. Which has been supported by browsers for a good 5 years already. If a visitor wants to use ancient, insecure stuff, be my guest - just not on my sites.

Óscar avatar
cn flag
Thanks for your answer. It's only about a 1% of the users but the question is, do I allow them to use the website with a low security protocol, or do I reject them? What do they prefer? The users with updated browsers can anyway use TLS 1.2 or 1.3 so, as long as I understand, they will not be affected by the website supporting TLS 1 and 1.1 at the same time.
cl flag
You reject them. `ssl-default-bind-options ssl-min-ver TLSv1.2` and anything older will be discarded.
I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.