Score:0

Difference between quorum setups

sz flag

Three environments (LAB, DEV/TEST, PROD) 2 NODES (active, inactive), 7 ROLES.

Experiencing fail over issues on the PROD environment, but the LAB and DEV/TEST clusters are not experiencing the same issue.

QUORUM setups are different.

LAB - Witness: Quorum Disk

DEV/TEST - Witness : Quorum Disk

PROD - Witness : Cluster Disk Quorum

On the PROD system, under resources, the Q drive is a Shared Storage - Dynamic Quorum

On the LAB/DEV/TEST, under resources, the Q drive is a normal letter drive

Questions are...

  1. What is the difference between a quorum type of Quorum Disk and Cluster Disk Quorum?

  2. Should I have the same type of quorum setup on all three systems (this might be an obvious answer), with all three quorum type of normal drive letter, and not the Shared Storage type?

Score:0
cn flag

Production is a Dynamic Witness. All are Disk Witness quorum types, and all clusters are Node Majority with Disk Witness.

A Dynamic Witness vote is toggled based on the number of votes. If there are an odd number of votes, the witness doesn't have a vote. If there is an even number of votes, the witness has a vote. Dynamic witness significantly reduces the risk that the cluster will go down because of witness failure. The cluster decides whether to use the witness vote based on the number of voting nodes that are available in the cluster.

Reference:

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure-stack/hci/concepts/quorum#dynamic-witness

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/failover-clustering/manage-cluster-quorum

Score:0
sz flag

We changed the type of quorum disk from dynamic to a plain old drive partition.

no issues since.

I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.