Persistent ZFS pool errors on Ubuntu, even after repeated scrubs

Paul Leyland

6/1/24, 3:53 PM

My 3-disk ZFS pool has been scrubbed several times after replacing failing disks.

"zpool status -v" provided a list of files which were deleted and removed a good number of errors.

Despite running a couple of "zpool scrub" processes to completion, I am still getting output as follows:

root@ra:/root# zpool status -v | head -25
  pool: backup
 state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data
    corruption.  Applications may be affected.
action: Restore the file in question if possible.  Otherwise restore the
    entire pool from backup.
   see: https://openzfs.github.io/openzfs-docs/msg/ZFS-8000-8A
  scan: scrub canceled on Thu Jun  1 16:23:28 2023
config:

    NAME                        STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
    backup                      ONLINE       0     0     0
      raidz1-0                  ONLINE       0     0     0
        wwn-0x50014ee2bf658d03  ONLINE       0     0 1.25K
        wwn-0x5000c500e5ee7f5b  ONLINE       0     0 1.48K
        wwn-0x5000c500e5ef7436  ONLINE       0     0 1.48K

errors: Permanent errors have been detected in the following files:

        backup:<0x2ed701>
        backup:<0x2e1d02>
        backup:<0x235104>
        backup:<0x2e1d05>
        backup:<0x2e1d06>
        backup:<0x2e1e06>

My forays into the docs have shown no way of repairing this. The pool as a whole can be seen to have zero READ/WRITE/CKSUM errors, as does the disk array. Each member of the array, however, has a significant number of CKSUM errors.

Should I be concerned? Will the pool continue to remain error free until more hardware starts to fail?

Thanks,

Paul

0 + 0

zfsonlinux

openzfs

ubuntu-22.04

Elon Musk

I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:

EN: Persistent ZFS pool errors on Ubuntu, even after repeated scrubs

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.