Score:0

Why does the `sa` command (from the acct package) always show "0" for avio?

il flag

For example, I get:

0 host:~# sa -m
                                     6908 4946803.89re    1211.65cp         0avio      2558k
clamav                                  2  363298.58re     990.07cp         0avio     71384k
root                                 3856 2974216.18re     161.88cp         0avio      2456k
messagebus                              1  193772.20re      52.31cp         0avio      2274k
systemd-timesync                        1  125505.87re       2.24cp         0avio     23280k
postfix                               130   96729.33re       1.75cp         0avio     11068k
spampd                                  6     223.03re       1.41cp         0avio     33627k
nobody                               1364       1.88re       0.37cp         0avio      1118k

These processes are definitely reading and writing to disk so I expect a non-zero value for disk i/o related statistics.

Is there a kernel flag or compile flag or command option to get a value for "avio" (also "tio" is not even listed)?

Thank you!

uz flag
I am not a c-programmer, but the `0` is probably originating from the source, see line #955 here: https://github.com/Whissi/gnu-acct/blob/master/sa.c
Jamie McClelland avatar
il flag
I just updated my question to clarify that I expect these processes to be consuming disk i/o so I expect a non-zero number. Is there something on line #955 that suggests a configuration change I need to make to get these values to be populated? Or are you suggesting: if it says 0 it means there is no disk i/o for the process?
I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.