Score:0

Wireguard can not access some sites

in flag

I am using Ubuntu 20.04 with x86_64 Linux 5.8.0-55-generic kernel. I use linuxserver/wireguard docker image as Wireguard server. This is my docker-compose.yml of wireguard docker:

---
version: "2.1"
services:
  wireguard:
    image: ghcr.io/linuxserver/wireguard
    container_name: wireguard
    cap_add:
      - NET_ADMIN
      - SYS_MODULE
    environment:
      - PUID=0
      - PGID=0
      - TZ=Europe/London
      - SERVERURL=<my-server-address>
      - SERVERPORT=51820
      - PEERS="ios,laptop,pc"
      - PEERDNS=8.8.8.8,8.8.4.4,2001:4860:4860:8888,2001:4860:4860:8844
      - INTERNAL_SUBNET=10.13.13.0 #optional
      - ALLOWEDIPS=0.0.0.0/0
    volumes:
      - /opt/wireguard-server/config:/config
      - /lib/modules:/lib/modules
    ports:
      - 51820:51820/udp
    sysctls:
      - net.ipv4.conf.all.src_valid_mark=1
      - net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=0
    restart: always

This is a config file I use:

[Interface]
Address = 10.13.13.3
PrivateKey = <private-key>
ListenPort = 51820
DNS = 8.8.8.8,8.8.4.4,2001:4860:4860:8888,2001:4860:4860:8844

[Peer]
PublicKey = <public-key>
Endpoint = <my-server-address>:51820
AllowedIPs = 0.0.0.0/0
PersistentKeepalive = 25

The config file works well but I can not reach some websites, like Kaggle, and I don't know why :( when I execute ping www.kaggle.com I get:

PING www.kaggle.com (35.244.233.98) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 98.233.244.35.bc.googleusercontent.com (35.244.233.98): icmp_seq=1 ttl=116 time=112 ms
64 bytes from 98.233.244.35.bc.googleusercontent.com (35.244.233.98): icmp_seq=2 ttl=116 time=111 ms
64 bytes from 98.233.244.35.bc.googleusercontent.com (35.244.233.98): icmp_seq=3 ttl=116 time=111 ms
^C
--- www.kaggle.com ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2003ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 111.054/111.255/111.503/0.186 ms
mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.