Score:0

Whatsapp attach screen unreadable characters

py flag

I would like to attach a .pdf file and get a screen with rectangles. How to fix it? Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS

Thank you.enter image description here

ChanganAuto avatar
us flag
Is this the same problem you had days ago with Skype? Are you sure you installed the additional fonts, accepting the license and all? What are you using here for Whatsapp, the web version or some (unofficial) client, which one?
ChanganAuto avatar
us flag
Additional question: Can you open the PDF normally and is it readable? What language(s) / alphabet(s) should be there?
ubontik avatar
py flag
A PDF file opens without any problem. I got Whatsapp from Ubuntu Software (WhatsApp for linux (unofficial)). Before WhatsApp for linux I had whatsdesk, and it was fine. Probably it was updated and after that I have this issue.Yes, I did have the same problem with Skype but now it's OK.The Unicode font is there. I tried to take the same steps as for Skype but it does not help.
ubontik avatar
py flag
I ran it from terminal and got the following output:`$ whatsdesk /bin/sh: 1: update-alternatives: Permission denied (whatsdesk:12130): Gtk-WARNING **: 09:25:43.750: Theme parsing error: gtk.css:1566:23: 'font-feature-settings' is not a valid property name (whatsdesk:12130): Gtk-WARNING **: 09:25:43.755: Theme parsing error: gtk.css:3618:25: 'font-feature-settings' is not a valid property name (whatsdesk:12130): Gtk-WARNING **: 09:25:43.756: Theme parsing error: gtk.css:4080:23: 'font-feature-settings' is not a valid property name`
Jose Miguel avatar
nc flag
look this: https://askubuntu.com/questions/1224125/font-characters-displayed-as-squares-in-ubuntu-18-04 change chromiun and use whatsdesk /kesty It works
s.cdm avatar
at flag
You can resolve this issue by installing the 22.04 fonts. It worked for me! :-) https://ubuntuhandbook.org/index.php/2023/04/restore-old-fonts-ubuntu-2304/
mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.