Join Log in
Score:0
Doug avatar Ubuntu

Remote MaaS DHCP/rackd shuts down when no connection to main regiond

bw flag
Doug

I've noticed that with the latest MaaS (v3.0.0, specifically the snap version), that if a remote rackd loses connection to the main regiond service, the the rackd will shutdown the DHCP server:

2021-08-10 22:20:42 ClusterClient,client: [info] ClusterClient connection lost (HOST:IPv6Address(type='TCP', host='::ffff:172.30.255.200', port=48606, flowInfo=0, scopeID=0) PEER:IPv6Address(type=
'TCP', host='::ffff:172.31.255.200', port=5250, flowInfo=0, scopeID=0))
2021-08-10 22:20:42 provisioningserver.rpc.clusterservice: [info] Failure on ping dropping connection to event-loop: maasv2:pid=1354
2021-08-10 22:20:42 ClusterClient,client: [info] ClusterClient connection lost (HOST:IPv6Address(type='TCP', host='::ffff:172.30.255.200', port=38118, flowInfo=0, scopeID=0) PEER:IPv6Address(type=
'TCP', host='::ffff:172.31.255.200', port=5253, flowInfo=0, scopeID=0))
2021-08-10 22:20:42 provisioningserver.rpc.clusterservice: [info] Failure on ping dropping connection to event-loop: maasv2:pid=1355
2021-08-10 22:20:42 provisioningserver.rpc.clusterservice: [info] Lost all connections to region controllers. Stopping service(s) dhcpd.
2021-08-10 22:20:42 ClusterClient,client: [info] ClusterClient connection lost (HOST:IPv6Address(type='TCP', host='::ffff:172.30.255.200', port=55878, flowInfo=0, scopeID=0) PEER:IPv6Address(type=
'TCP', host='::ffff:172.31.255.200', port=5251, flowInfo=0, scopeID=0))
2021-08-10 22:20:43 provisioningserver.rpc.clusterservice: [info] Failure on ping dropping connection to event-loop: maasv2:pid=1356

I was previously using 2.4.2 and didn't run into this issue; is there anyway to keep the DHCP service running in 3.0.0 if the connection to the main regiond is interrupted?

21
0 + 0
ธงชาติไทย
Elon Musk
I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.