Score:0

Wordfast on Ubuntu: Error by the Java Runtime Environment

hr flag

I am new on Ubuntu (try to switch from Windows). Now I try to run Wordfast Pro 7.2.0 on Ubuntu.

Running the programm leads to the following error:

A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:

SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x00007f741806b740, pid=8313, tid=8383

JRE version: OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (11.0.13+8) (build 11.0.13+8) Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 18.9 (11.0.13+8, mixed mode, tiered, compressed oops, g1 gc, linux-amd64) Problematic frame: C [libX11.so.6+0x2b740] XInternAtom+0x40

I deinstalled OpenJDK and installed Oracle JDK but still receive the same error.

"java -version" gives:

Java version "17.0.5" 2022-10-18 LTS Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 17.0.5+9-LTS-191) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 17.0.5+9-LTS-191, mixed mode, sharing)

Could you please help me to find a solution?

in flag
Welcome to AskUbuntu, and Ubuntu in general! Which version of Ubuntu are you running? The error that you've experienced is – apologies for the upcoming technobabble – the result of an incompatibility with *some* Wayland sessions. If you are running a version of Ubuntu that uses Wayland, then you'll need to switch it to the older X manager. [This answer](https://askubuntu.com/a/1428532/1222991) shows you how to do it.
Risu avatar
hr flag
Hello, thank you for your help and quick reply! I run Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS. I'll try to follow the answer. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction!
Risu avatar
hr flag
That solved the issue. Thank you!
Score:0
ax flag

It is a missing library:

sudo apt install libgconf-2-4

And restart Wordfast

I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.