Score:0

errors when trying to connect to Ubuntu from win7 through samba

in flag

I have set up samba on my Ubuntu 22.04 server. I'm trying to connect to it from a Win 7 computer, but I get these errors in /var/log/samba:

[2022/12/14 20:55:07.957849,  3] ../../source3/smbd/process.c:1957(process_smb)   Transaction 0 of length 137 (0 toread)  
[2022/12/14 20:55:07.957861,  3] ../../source3/smbd/process.c:1549(switch_message)   switch message SMBnegprot (pid 358391) conn 0x0  
[2022/12/14 20:55:07.958011,  3] ../../source3/smbd/negprot.c:637(reply_negprot)   Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0]  
[2022/12/14 20:55:07.958019,  3] ../../source3/smbd/negprot.c:637(reply_negprot)   Requested protocol [LANMAN1.0]  
[2022/12/14 20:55:07.958022,  3] ../../source3/smbd/negprot.c:637(reply_negprot)   Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a]  
[2022/12/14 20:55:07.958024,  3] ../../source3/smbd/negprot.c:637(reply_negprot)   Requested protocol [LM1.2X002]  
[2022/12/14 20:55:07.958027,  3] ../../source3/smbd/negprot.c:637(reply_negprot)   Requested protocol [LANMAN2.1]  
[2022/12/14 20:55:07.958029,  3] ../../source3/smbd/negprot.c:637(reply_negprot)   Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] 
[2022/12/14 20:55:07.958062,  3] ../../source3/smbd/negprot.c:758(reply_negprot)   reply_negprot: No protocol supported !  
[2022/12/14 20:55:07.958154,  3] ../../source3/smbd/server_exit.c:239(exit_server_common)   Server exit (no protocol supported   )  
[2022/12/14 20:55:19.974954,  3] ../../source3/smbd/service.c:1125(close_cnum)   blackbeard_3 (ipv4:10.0.0.5:49348) closed connection to service IPC$  
[2022/12/14 20:55:19.976956,  3] ../../source3/smbd/server_exit.c:239(exit_server_common)   Server exit (NT_STATUS_END_OF_FILE)

I'm not sure what this means - if it's a problem on the Windows computer or the Ubuntu computer - and how to fix it.

I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.