Score:1

Is this system affected by CVE-2019-7304?

tr flag

I am analyzing a system that since a month shows two new users in the login screen.

After some research I stumbled over the exploit of snap: CVE-2019-7304

I checked the passwd file and found a new user in there.

However, the currently installed version of snapd should not be affected by the exploit.

Yet I found the following journal logs: enter image description here (Sorry for screenshot as I could not copy text.)

snapd was in version 2.57.6 at time of check. But it was upgraded in the meantime.

  1. Does that mean the system was/ is affected?

  2. If snapd was directly upgraded afterwards that still means the system is vulnerable due to the newly created user, right?

ru flag
Check under "status" on the CVE link - it indicates which package versions were patched in which OS. Compare that against the version of snapd installed on your computer (see `apt info snapd | grep Version`). If that version of snapd is higher than or equal to the version specified in the CVE notes for where it was fixed, you SHOULD be patched already against the system. Before you do anything you have to validate the version of the package on your system before 'assuming' something is still vulnerable.
rayon avatar
tr flag
`snapd` was in version 2.57.6 at time of check. But it was upgraded in the meantime.
I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.