Score:2

No microcode detected after installation and reboot

gg flag

I noticed an error in GCP log:

[    0.294304] MMIO Stale Data: Vulnerable: Clear CPU buffers attempted, no microcode

After installation, I then ran these commands:

sudo apt-get install microcode.ctl intel-microcode
sudo reboot now

However, running sudo dmesg | grep microcode still states that there is no microcode (see image below).

enter image description here

System specs:

System: Ubuntu 20.04.5 LTS (GNU/Linux 5.15.0-1025-gcp x86_64)
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU @ 2.20GHz

Score:1
vn flag

That's not an error message, but a status message related to the "Processor MMIO Stale Data Vulnerabilities".

From Kernel.org documentation:

Mitigation status information

The Linux kernel provides a sysfs interface to enumerate the current vulnerability status of the system: whether the system is vulnerable, and which mitigations are active. The relevant sysfs file is:

/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/mmio_stale_data

The possible values in this file are:

Value Status
‘Not affected’ The processor is not vulnerable
‘Vulnerable’ The processor is vulnerable, but no mitigation enabled
‘Vulnerable: Clear CPU buffers attempted, no microcode’ The processor is vulnerable, but microcode is not updated. The mitigation is enabled on a best effort basis.
‘Mitigation: Clear CPU buffers’ The processor is vulnerable and the CPU buffer clearing mitigation is enabled.
‘Unknown: No mitigations’ The processor vulnerability status is unknown because it is out of Servicing period. Mitigation is not attempted.

So this is basically a service message that tells you that your CPU has this vulnerability, and that there isn't a microcode fix for it installed.

It seems you have the latest microcode packages installed - so I suppose a full fix isn't possible for that CPU at this time.

I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.