Score:0

I broke the Gnome Settings –> Background

az flag

I was working toward creating a new background image slideshow. I created a new XML pair for the settings and for the slideshow. My proof-of-concept files worked (two images and transitions moving back and forth once the new slideshow was selected from Settings).

This PoC used symlinks in a single folder. My next step was t o test two images from directly within the folder hierarchy. These file paths may contain special characters. I selected two files where one merely included spaces and a second which included three special characters (the ’ and the open and closed squares: []).

The file with the spaces worked as expected; the other did not display in the slideshow. I then added quotations around the paths to see if this would remedy the matter. It did not.

However, this testing broke the background settings. I suspect whatever ingests those XML files now contains corrupted data and can no longer do its job. That’s just a guess.

What do I mean by broken? There are no longer any images or slideshow objects listed in the settings one might select. The newly created was present until I removed those files. The default (two slideshows and a handful of images) are all gone from the settings dialog (though all remain in the file system as expected).

Once I removed my new slideshow (both XML files) and chose a different file as a background (using the still functional Add Picture button), that new slideshow also vanished from the background settings.

Reboots have not helped and this (of course) impacts all users.

How can I fix this? What did that ingested XML break?

Ubuntu 22.04

Also asked on Gnome: https://discourse.gnome.org/t/i-broke-the-gnome-settings-background/14420

I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.