Join Log in
Score:0
avatar Ubuntu

How to know which device is causing PCIe Bus Error severity=Corrected AER: Corrected error received

cn flag
Enrique

I've begun noticing the /dev/mapper/data-root volume was 100% used
Then noticed logs kern.log and syslog were 95gb each

Aug 1 08:24:42 mypc kernel: [73212.049797] pcieport 0000:00:1c.0: AER: Corrected error received: 0000:00:1c.0
Aug 1 08:24:42 mypc kernel: [73212.049802] pcieport 0000:00:1c.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Physical Layer, (Receiver ID)
Aug 1 08:24:42 mypc kernel: [73212.049803] pcieport 0000:00:1c.0:   device [8086:a294] error status/mask=00000001/00002000
Aug 1 08:24:42 mypc kernel: [73212.049804] pcieport 0000:00:1c.0:    [ 0] RxErr                 
Aug 1 08:24:42 mypc kernel: [73212.050514] pcieport 0000:00:1c.0: AER: Corrected error received: 0000:00:1c.0
Aug 1 08:24:42 mypc kernel: [73212.050519] pcieport 0000:00:1c.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Physical Layer, (Receiver ID)
Aug 1 08:24:42 mypc kernel: [73212.050520] pcieport 0000:00:1c.0:   device [8086:a294] error status/mask=00000001/00002000
Aug 1 08:24:42 mypc kernel: [73212.050522] pcieport 0000:00:1c.0:    [ 0] RxErr

Then remembered about pci=noaer in the grub file
I've done that and seems to be solved, but

Is there any way to know which is de "faulty" device and why is causing that?
And finally, how to solve that error and solve the log filling without editing the grub file?

Here is my
lspci -nn

00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 8th Gen Core Processor Host Bridge/DRAM Registers [8086:3ec2] (rev 0d)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation CoffeeLake-S GT2 [UHD Graphics 630] [8086:3e98] (rev 02)
00:14.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 200 Series/Z370 Chipset Family USB 3.0 xHCI Controller [8086:a2af]
00:16.0 Communication controller [0780]: Intel Corporation 200 Series PCH CSME HECI #1 [8086:a2ba]
00:17.0 SATA controller [0106]: Intel Corporation 200 Series PCH SATA controller [AHCI mode] [8086:a282]
00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 200 Series PCH PCI Express Root Port #5 [8086:a294] (rev f0)
00:1c.7 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 200 Series PCH PCI Express Root Port #8 [8086:a297] (rev f0)
00:1d.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 200 Series PCH PCI Express Root Port #11 [8086:a29a] (rev f0)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation Device [8086:a2ca]
00:1f.2 Memory controller [0580]: Intel Corporation 200 Series/Z370 Chipset Family Power Management Controller [8086:a2a1]
00:1f.3 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 200 Series PCH HD Audio [8086:a2f0]
00:1f.4 SMBus [0c05]: Intel Corporation 200 Series/Z370 Chipset Family SMBus Controller [8086:a2a3]
01:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8192EE PCIe Wireless Network Adapter [10ec:818b]
02:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller [10ec:8168] (rev 15)

Thanks in advance

67
0 + 1
Terrance avatar
id flag
Terrance
It is whatever is in this port `00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 200 Series PCH PCI Express Root Port #5 [8086:a294] (rev f0)` that is failing. I would recommend removing hardware from the PCI ports and testing. It could be also a built in GPU error, or a motherboard error. Either would need to be replaced if you are still getting the error after stripping down the motherboard of added hardware. There really isn't a lot of info out there about this device: https://linux-hardware.org/?id=pci:8086-a294-1462-7a90
2
Reply
ธงชาติไทย
Elon Musk
I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.