Score:0

ACPI error and couldn’t get size 0x800000000000000e while I reboot my Ubuntu 16.04

ci flag

I reboot my computer and I got ACPI error and Couldn’t get size error with the picture.

output:

ACPI Exror: Ignore error and continue table load (20170831/psobject-642)

ACPI Error: Skip parsing opcode Scope (20170831/psloop-559)

ACPI Error: [_SB_.PCI0.RP13.PXSX] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND(20170831/dswload2-191)

ACPI Exception: AE_NOT_FOUND,During name lookup/catalog (20170831/psobje ct-253

ACPI Error: Ignore error and continue table load (20170831-psobject-642)

ACPI Error: Skip parsing opcode Scope (20170831/psloop-559)

ACPI Error:[\_SB_.PCI0.RP05 .PXSX.WIST] Namespace lookup failure,AE NOT_FOUND (20170831/psargs-364)

ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \CNDP, AE_NOT_FOUND (20170831 psparse-550)

ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \, AE_NOT_FOUND (20170831/psparse-550)

ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.SPI1.FPNT._CRS, AE_AML_INVALID_RESOURCE_TYPE (20170831/psparse-550)

ACPI Error: Method execution failed \_SB.PCI0.SPI1 .FPNT ._CRS, AE_AML_INVALID_RESOURCE_TYPE (20170831/uteval-103)

ACPI Error:Method parse/execution failed \_SB.PCI0.SPI2.FPNT._CRS, AE_AML_INVALID_RESOURCE_TYPE (20170831/psparse-550)

ACPI Error: Method execution failed \_SB.PCI0.SPI2 .FPNT._CRS,AE_AML_INVALID_RESOURCE_TYPE (20170831/uteval-103)

Couldn't get size: 0x80000000000000e

My Ubuntu version is 16.04, and CPU is i7-8700.

I still can reboot and enter the windows system but Ubuntu can’t.

What causes this problem and how can I fix it?

The output on my screen

When I try to enter the recovery mode,the output stuck at clocksource: tsc:mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x2e02da5648a, max_idla_ns: 440795205522 ns

recovery mode output

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.