Score:0

Two Different Ciphers with Same MD5

cn flag

I was wondering if someone could help explain md5 collision abit better. I found this resource: https://www.mscs.dal.ca/~selinger/md5collision/ where they provided an example of where two cipher texts have the same md5. I tried to confirm that their example was correct but when I input their examples into a md5 calculator, I get two different md5s for the two different cipher text. What am I doing wrong?

dave_thompson_085 avatar
cn flag
Those aren't cipher texts or ciphers, and MD5 is not a cipher. MD5 is a cryptographic hash, also called a digest (algorithm). The data on that page is in hexadecimal aka hex, as is much cryptographic and other computer-related data displayed for humans; is whatever md5 calculator you are using (there are millions of different ones) set up for hex input?
ming alex avatar
in flag
My result is the same, i.e. 79054025255fb1a26e4bc422aef54eb4, for the both two different inputs. I suggest you to use some HEX tools, such as WinHex, to generate the two files, not note, or noetpad.
Score:3
ng flag
SSA

you have to convert them to bytes before you use them. I use python to find md5 hash. x='d131dd02c5e6eec4693d9a0698aff95c2fcab58712467eab4004583eb8fb7f8955ad340609f4b30283e488832571415a085125e8f7cdc99fd91dbdf280373c5bd8823e3156348f5bae6dacd436c919c6dd53e2b487da03fd02396306d248cda0e99f33420f577ee8ce54b67080a80d1ec69821bcb6a8839396f9652b6ff72a70'

 c=bytes.fromhex(x)

b'\xd11\xdd\x02\xc5\xe6\xee\xc4i=\x9a\x06\x98\xaf\xf9\/\xca\xb5\x87\x12F~\xab@\x04X>\xb8\xfb\x7f\x89U\xad4\x06\t\xf4\xb3\x02\x83\xe4\x88\x83%qAZ\x08Q%\xe8\xf7\xcd\xc9\x9f\xd9\x1d\xbd\xf2\x807<[\xd8\x82>1V4\x8f[\xaem\xac\xd46\xc9\x19\xc6\xddS\xe2\xb4\x87\xda\x03\xfd\x029c\x06\xd2H\xcd\xa0\xe9\x9f3B\x0fW~\xe8\xceT\xb6p\x80\xa8\r\x1e\xc6\x98!\xbc\xb6\xa8\x83\x93\x96\xf9e+o\xf7*p'

n=hashlib.md5(c)

bas.hexlify(n.digest())

b'79054025255fb1a26e4bc422aef54eb4'

same way taking y has another string and converting it to bytes first.

c2= bytes.fromhex(y)

b'\xd11\xdd\x02\xc5\xe6\xee\xc4i=\x9a\x06\x98\xaf\xf9\\/\xca\xb5\x07\x12F~\xab@\x04X>\xb8\xfb\x7f\x89U\xad4\x06\t\xf4\xb3\x02\x83\xe4\x88\x83%\xf1AZ\x08Q%\xe8\xf7\xcd\xc9\x9f\xd9\x1d\xbdr\x807<[\xd8\x82>1V4\x8f[\xaem\xac\xd46\xc9\x19\xc6\xddS\xe24\x87\xda\x03\xfd\x029c\x06\xd2H\xcd\xa0\xe9\x9f3B\x0fW~\xe8\xceT\xb6p\x80(\r\x1e\xc6\x98!\xbc\xb6\xa8\x83\x93\x96\xf9e\xabo\xf7*p'

v=hashlib.md5(c2) bas.hexlify(v.digest())

b'79054025255fb1a26e4bc422aef54eb4'
mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.