Score:0

Huawei S5600 main OIDs?

it flag

I'm working with NagiosCore to check the stats of my network's switchs (mainly S5700 (modulars and non-modulars) and S5600). Using SNMP (v2c) I'm able to get stuff defined by myself such as: DeviceName, Location, Contact, and Description of the ifaces (ports) I'm currently using, as too the status (up/down) of those mentioned ifaces.

Now I would love to also check CPU_usage, MEM_usage, Temperature, PowerSupply_Status, and Bandwith_usage. I can do it trough snmpget using the OIDs I get from Huawei Infoweb but only for the S5700, I can't find any information in that web (or in any other web) related to the S5600's OIDs, I don't know if the S5600 is discontinued or what, but it is not showing on any of the Huawei Infoweb webs...

S5600 not showing up in Huawei Infoweb

Sooo... I would like to know the S5600's OIDs related to:

  • CPU_usage
  • MEM_usage
  • Temperature
  • PowerSupply_Status
  • Bandwith_usage

Thanks in advance

Vadim avatar
ar flag
Try OIDs from this template https://share.zabbix.com/network_devices/huawei/huawei-quidway-s5600-series-switches-template
k.Cyborg avatar
it flag
Mate, that link doesn't work for me :-(, maybe can work for another producer of the S5600. The only OID I found in that link that maybe work for me it is the *CPU medium load*: `.1.3.6.1.2.1.25.3.3.1.2`, but doesn't start with the right code, when should be: `.1.3.6.1.4.1.2011.6.1.1.1.2.65536`, starting with the `.1.3.6.1.4.1.2011.`. Thanks anyways!!!
Score:0
it flag

A coworker of mine found a chinese blog ChinaUnix from where we extract 2 of the OIDs we wanted to use:

CPUUSAGE=".1.3.6.1.4.1.2011.6.1.1.1.2.65536"

MEMUSAGE=".1.3.6.1.4.1.2011.10.2.6.1.1.1.1.8.20"

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.