Score:0

Email headers: Source IP in x-source-ip but not in "Received" hops

de flag

I'm investigating an email and in its headers all the hops (Received entries) are private (10.X.X.X) addresses. Initially I thought that this simply meant that the email originated from the same mail-server (so it never needed to do a public hop). However, after contacting the provider (Intermedia), they informed me that the source is determined from a different section of the header (x-source-ip).

After doing some research it seems to me that if the IP address found under x-source-ip is not also found somewhere in the original (Received) hops, then the x-source-ip has been spoofed. Or is it somehow possible for the original source to be in x-source-ip and not in the hops? Email headers are below.

Received: from X-E5-VA-1.x.domain.local (10.219.12.138) by
 X-E5-VA-1.x.domain.local (10.219.12.138) with Microsoft SMTP
 Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P521) id
 15.1.2375.17 via Mailbox Transport; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 09:10:41 -0500
Received: from X-E5-VA-2.x.domain.local (10.219.12.140) by
 X-E5-VA-1.x.domain.local (10.219.12.138) with Microsoft SMTP
 Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P521) id
 15.1.2375.17; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 09:10:40 -0500
Received: from x-va-1-2.serverpod.net (10.216.74.75) by
 X-E5-VA-2.x.domain.local (10.219.12.141) with Microsoft SMTP
 Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P521) id
 15.1.2375.17 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 09:10:40 -0500
Received: from x-va-1-3.serverpod.net (x-va-1-3.serverpod.net [10.216.76.86])
    (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
     key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
    (No client certificate requested)
    by x-va-1.serverpod.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA7FE100005
    for <[email protected]>; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 06:10:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out.x.serverdata.net (unknown [10.219.12.138])
    (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
    (No client certificate requested)
    by x-va-1.serverpod.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95881100004
    for <[email protected]>; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 06:10:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from X-E5-VA-1.x.domain.local (10.219.12.138) by
 X-E5-VA-1.x.domain.local (10.219.12.138) with Microsoft SMTP
 Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P521) id
 15.1.2375.17; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 09:10:40 -0500
Received: from X-E5-VA-1.x.domain.local ([10.219.12.138]) by
 X-E5-VA-1.x.domain.local ([10.219.12.138]) with mapi id
 15.01.2375.017; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 09:10:40 -0500
From: mycompany.com <[email protected]>
To: First Last <[email protected]>
Subject: Your account is scheduled for termination!!!
Thread-Topic: Your account is scheduled for termination!!!
Thread-Index: AQHX7c+dWsv6PH5mQUqK59FFKaujxQ==
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 14:10:40 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=bankomatchik.ru;  s=dkim;
 t=1639144993;  bh=JRc5i07SeJJi7IKmf4kk7YS+u37nZRSWTa9JN4q+GDw=;
    h=To:Subject:Date:From:From;
    b=VlYQOrD2H6zI5UnWGneQEyqNAPMa9AYQVNeOi+893IPfLfpaEq4ut7VUj338N1UQc
     U26YJl80XrFXtwxQ8QPpTmwJpMhg9eeEYN9FkgxR8eqWIbCtwZCbJkxj1WrMIML9V3
     FuBXeDZOD60tMaucFBp6PgRy6snRakQjs7E4JJr8=
x-cmae-score: 0
x-cmae-analysis: v=2.2 cv=DMz/22Fb c=1 sm=1 tr=0
    a=uUzqdBFmwskn7PK6BrDENA==:117 a=uUzqdBFmwskn7PK6BrDENA==:17
    a=IOMw9HtfNCkA:10 a=G7ipKTrHp8AA:10 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9    a=07qlFErKAAAA:8
 a=EQh1O3JVudHgXb9kck8A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=1O92t69KAAAA:8
 a=lpIj0mRyDt8dnHIlFYYA:9 a=lNjrS4_qGLc71qEN:21 a=m7PwTm9v_g-j7EjRtLGg:22
 a=Ol1NtEL7n3yPw0winTxy:22
x-source-ip: 46.36.222.102
x-spf-status: pass
x-rdns-status: pass
spam-stopper-id: cd2e25c5-1d15-4d0f-8a52-bc5fceb90982
x-spam-category: LEGIT
x-spam-reasons: {'verdict': 'clean', 'spamcause':
 'gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrkedvgdeiudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfkpffvgfftoffgfffktedpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucgoufhushhpvggtthffohhmrghinhculdegledmnecujfgurhepvffufffhkfggtgfgsegrkehjphdttdejnecuhfhrohhmpedfphgrghgvjhhonhgvshdrtghomhdfuceoshhuphhpohhrthessggrnhhkohhmrghttghhihhkrdhruheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudevjeehlefhhfehkeeifeefveegkedujedtkeffjeelfeduvddvffeifeetffeinecuffhomhgrihhnpeifvggsrdgrphhpnecukfhppeegiedrfeeirddvvddvrddutddvnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepgeeirdefiedrvddvvddruddtvddpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehsuhhpphhorhhtsegsrghnkhhomhgrthgthhhikhdrrhhupdhrtghpthhtohepphhmohhrghgrnhesphgrghgvjhhonhgvshdrtghomh',
 'internal': ['[email protected]', 'From="mycompany.com"
 <[email protected]>'], 'elapsed': '17ms'}
x-aes-category: LEGIT
x-spam-score: 49
x-ms-exchange-transport-endtoendlatency: 00:00:00.1949891
x-ms-exchange-processed-by-bccfoldering: 15.01.2375.017
x-armorblox-processed: YES
x-spf-from-status: not_checked
x-dkim: OpenDKIM Filter v2.6.8 mail.microgenius.ru 5A7E599FB6
x-originating-ip: [10.232.212.161]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
    boundary="_000_50ef8cf96073a3a05bd6a6b1f8985875bankomatchikru_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Spam-Stopper-Id: 2f55156e-4535-43bc-8950-d9b2bb44a4ba
Spam-Stopper-v2: Yes
X-Armorblox-Processed: YES
Return-Path: [email protected]
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Network-Message-Id: 8ad1c7e6-d9ca-43b1-292b-08d9bbe6d919
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: X-E5-VA-2.x.domain.local
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-Processed-By-BccFoldering: 15.01.2375.017
mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.