Score:0

GCSFuse setting times of 'XX': Permission denied

co flag

Debian Bullseye running GCS Fuse, after a series of updates it now give me the setting times error, for example:

touch hi

touch: setting times of 'hi': Permission denied

I am really at a loss here. Everything is updated.

Divyani Yadav avatar
ng flag
can you refer to the link: https://stackoverflow.com/a/50684724/15774176 Is it helpful?
cn flag
Considering a bare `touch` doesn't attempt to modify the date at all, this is a puzzler. But if you are trying to set the date, that's a separate syscall that might be blocked.
Score:0
pe flag

Firstly validate the folders permissions.

then:

As you can validate in the reference Access permissions

As a security measure, fuse itself restricts file system access to the user who mounted the file system (cf. fuse.txt). For this reason, gcsfuse by default shows all files as owned by the invoking user. Therefore you should invoke gcsfuse as the user that will be using the file system, not as root.

If you know what you are doing, you can override these behaviors with the allow_other mount option supported by fuse and with the --uid and --gid flags supported by gcsfuse. Be careful, this may have security implications!

Score:-1
co flag

Ok, seems version changes dictate full instead of R/W on the compute instance storage option.

user206106 avatar
co flag
I posted the answer. Figured it out. Not sure why my answer shows down voted.
Arden Smith avatar
pe flag
Coz there is not much information about how do you debug the issue and how isolate this, even when you made the question with not much context and you provide an answer without details… outputs, screenshots and so on.
mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.