Score:0

Windows Search - Weird Results

ar flag

We are currently thinking about to enable Server Side Windows Search to speedup the search done by clients on Network shares.

Put to a test the performance is better, without doubt - but with having Windows Search enabled, the overall result is worse in terms of quality.

Assuming a search is done for the keyword RMC

Regular Search, traversing through all files and folders will take some time, but finally come up with a resultset that is quite logical, i.e.:

  • Folders, containing the word RMC (in their basename)
  • Files, containing the word RMC (in their basename)

After enabling Windows Search, and waiting for the Index to be build and performing the same search - the result is stunning fast, as in "no time" - But the result is really bad. It is now made of:

  • Folders, containing the word RMC (in their basename)
  • Files, containing the word RMC (in their basename)
  • Files with content RMC (this is desired or a nice to have)
  • Every f**** folder that is a subfolder of any folder named RMC even if that folder is in no way related to the keyword beside beeing a child in an infinite depth.

Is there a way to change this behaviour?

I.e. P:\Pictures\RMC\a\b\c\d\e\d\f\thisOne - I don't want to have thisOne (or a,b,c,d....) as part of my result list, just because its a subfolder of RMC

Combination where we observed this is Windows Server 2019 / Windows 11 if that has any impact maybe. (But Search itself on the server shows the same weird result)

Sure, it's a match on the folder's fullname - but as you can imagine this blows up the search result by a huge number of entries that are basically unnecessary.

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.