Join Log in
Score:0
user7468395 avatar Server

How to access service from virtual machine of another machine in local network?

iq flag
user7468395

I have two Ubuntu machines A and B in my local network.

Computer B has an openmediavault instance set up via KVM.

Computer B has the IP address 192.168.177.58, the openmediavault instance provides a service that I can access in the browser at the address http://192.168.122.153:3670 .

I cannot access this address in A's browser; but I can do so in B's browser.

How can I access the service of the openmediavault instance from A's browser?

This is the setup of my network:

enter image description here

in the console of computer B, I can see:

$ sudo ufw status
Status: inactive

In the console of computer A, it shows:

$ sudo ufw status
Status: active

To                         Action      From
--                         ------      ----
22/tcp                     ALLOW       Anywhere                  
3389/tcp                   ALLOW       Anywhere                  
22/tcp (v6)                ALLOW       Anywhere (v6)             
3389/tcp (v6)              ALLOW       Anywhere (v6)

The output for machine A for ip r is:

$ ip r
default via 192.168.177.1 dev wlan0 proto dhcp metric 600 
169.254.0.0/16 dev wlan0 scope link metric 1000 
192.168.7.0/24 dev vmnet1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.7.1 
192.168.95.0/24 dev vmnet8 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.95.1 
192.168.177.0/24 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.177.21 metric 600

and for machine B:

$ ip r
default via 192.168.177.1 dev enp1s0 proto dhcp metric 100 
169.254.0.0/16 dev virbr0 scope link metric 1000 
192.168.100.0/24 dev virbr1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.100.1 linkdown 
192.168.122.0/24 dev virbr0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.122.1 
192.168.177.0/24 dev enp1s0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.177.70 metric 100

I can see the following settings in the network part of KVM:

enter image description here

enter image description here

and could add a new network adapter, but I am unsure whether this would help:

enter image description here

enter image description here

The output of ip addr show on A:

$ ip addr show
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 ::1/128 scope host 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 28:d2:44:b7:53:7b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
3: wlan0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether e8:2a:ea:b6:41:bc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.177.21/24 brd 192.168.177.255 scope global dynamic noprefixroute wlan0
       valid_lft 846831sec preferred_lft 846831sec
    inet6 fe80::ea2a:eaff:feb6:41bc/64 scope link noprefixroute 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
4: vmnet1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:50:56:c0:00:01 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.7.1/24 brd 192.168.7.255 scope global vmnet1
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fec0:1/64 scope link 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
5: vmnet8: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:50:56:c0:00:08 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.95.1/24 brd 192.168.95.255 scope global vmnet8
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fec0:8/64 scope link 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

The output of ip addr show on B:

$ ip addr show
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 ::1/128 scope host 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: enp1s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 88:ae:dd:0f:f3:b5 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.177.70/24 brd 192.168.177.255 scope global dynamic noprefixroute enp1s0
       valid_lft 797182sec preferred_lft 797182sec
    inet6 fe80::42ea:dead:571a:66aa/64 scope link noprefixroute 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
3: wlp0s20f3: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether f8:9e:94:e2:f5:c7 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
10: virbr1: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 52:54:00:db:9f:16 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.100.1/24 brd 192.168.100.255 scope global virbr1
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
19: virbr0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 52:54:00:85:b6:9e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.122.1/24 brd 192.168.122.255 scope global virbr0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
22: vnet13: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master virbr0 state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether fe:54:00:e4:1b:11 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet6 fe80::fc54:ff:fee4:1b11/64 scope link 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
68
2 + 0
Score:0
avatar Server
ws flag
symcbean

According to its routing table, the only way for 'A' to access 192.168.122.0/24 is via the default route (192.168.177.1). Presumably the default router does not have a route for 192.168.122.0/24

I can't tell you how to fix this because you haven't provided any details of how the physical networks align to the IP subnets.

A really ugly (and dangerous) hack would be to enable routing on B and add a route on A to 192.168.122.0/24 via 192.168.177.58

+ 4
user7468395 avatar
iq flag
user7468395
Thanks a lot for your quick answer. Could you perhaps tell me how I could provide you the details about the alignment between the physical networks and the IP subnets (your second sentence)? I would amend my question afterwards. And apart from that: how would I enable routing on B to add the route on A (... your last sentence)? (I am unfortunately not experienced at all with all these topics until now). Thanks in advance.
0
Reply
ws flag
symcbean
Need a list or diagram showing where all the interfaces (both virtual and physical) are attached to ip sub-nets / physical networks.
0
Reply
user7468395 avatar
iq flag
user7468395
I amended my post with the output of `ip addr show`. If this is not what you meant: could you please tell me which command I have to put in a (bash) shell so that I could deliver to you what you are requesting? Thanks in advance! (as mentioned: I am an absolute beginner with regards to networking topics...)
0
Reply
ws flag
symcbean
Doesn't tell me the connections between the virtual NICs and brodges not between physical ports and bridges
0
Reply
Score:0
proxx avatar Server
ua flag
proxx

The usual way of doing such a thing is to have one central router that can access all of those networks, you could add a firewall/router into the network that is aware of all the subnets and is able to route the traffic into the required network. If your modem/router allows it you can add additional IP's to it.

But if this is just a simple home situation and you don't care too much about isolation then why not just add them into the same network?

The problem is the NAT network, just make it a bridge network directly into your network. KVM hypervisors usually have a bridge interface on which the other networks are connected. First hit on google: Bridge things

Or if you just want to have it running quick 'n dirty why not pass the webserver port over SSH via localforwarding: SSH localforwarding

+ 0
ธงชาติไทย
Elon Musk
I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.