Score:0

VPN route establish connection failed

pe flag

I am traing to connect from my VPN from work to home but it is failed (my real address is not 12.12.12.12 I chaneged it here).

initiating Main Mode IKE_SA Note8[3] to 12.12.12.12
generating ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V V ]
sending packet: from 192.168.222.113[500] to 12.12.12.12[500] (212 bytes)
received packet: from 12.12.12.12[500] to 192.168.222.113[500] (160 bytes)
parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ SA V V V V ]
received XAuth vendor ID
received DPD vendor ID
received FRAGMENTATION vendor ID
received NAT-T (RFC 3947) vendor ID
selected proposal: IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
generating ID_PROT request 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
sending packet: from 192.168.222.113[500] to 12.12.12.12[500] (244 bytes)
received packet: from 12.12.12.12[500] to 192.168.222.113[500] (244 bytes)
parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
local host is behind NAT, sending keep alives
remote host is behind NAT
generating ID_PRO`your text`T request 0 [ ID HASH N(INITIAL_CONTACT) ]
sending packet: from 192.168.222.113[4500] to 12.12.12.12[4500] (108 bytes)
received packet: from 12.12.12.12[4500] to 192.168.222.113[4500] (76 bytes)
parsed ID_PROT response`your text` 0 [ ID HASH ]
IDir '10.10.0.2' does not match to '12.12.12.12'
deletin`your text`g IKE_SA Note8[3] between 192.168.222.113[192.168.222.113]...12.12.12.12[%any]
sending DELETE for IKE_SA Note8[3]
generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 1142334682 [ HASH D ]
sending packet: from 192.168.222.113[4500] to 12.12.12.12[4500] (92 bytes)
establishing connection 'Note8' failed 


1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen `1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether b8:27:eb:b8:94:ac brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.1.1.1/24 brd 10.1.1.255 scope global eth0
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet 169.254.196.71/16 brd 169.254.255.255 scope global noprefixroute eth0
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever``your text``
inet6 fe80::ba27:eb`your te`your text`xt`ff:feb8:94ac/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

3: wlan0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether b8:27:eb:ed:c1:f9 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.222.113/24 brd 192.168.222.255 scope global dynamic noprefixroute wlan0
valid_lft 3487sec preferred_lft 3037sec
inet6 fe80::46b5:423:6a9b:9320/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 

`

I fount solution but I know not much about routing this can help but I do not knon how to chaneg this according my network

sleep 2m
ip route add 89.237.132.0/24 dev ppp0 src 89.237.132.229 table rt2
ip route add default via 89.237.132.225 dev ppp0 table rt2
ip rule add from 89.237.132.229/32 table rt2
ip rule add to 89.237.132.229/32 table rt2

ip route add 192.168.100.0/24 dev eth0 src 192.168.100.213 table rt3
ip route add default via 192.168.100.252 dev eth0 table rt3
ip rule add from 192.168.100.213/32 table rt3
ip rule add to 192.168.100.213/32 table rt3 

My route at this moment look like this:

Destination     Gatewa`your text`y         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
default         192.168.222.57  0.0.0.0         UG    303    0        0 wlan0
10.1.1.0        0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth0
link-local      0.0.0.0         255.255.0.0     U     202    0        0 eth0
192.168.222.0   0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     303    0        0 wlan0
I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.