Score:0

Desktop error and getting installed wine version- not

je flag

I wanted to check which version of wine I'm updated to, but when I run

wine --version

in a terminal, it launches 2 wine windows instead of showing me the version. One is titled "Default - Wine desktop" with a Program Error box saying

The program (unidentified) has encountered a serious problem and needs to close

and the other window titled "1024x768 - Wine desktop" and no error box in the desktop. Both show the 2 apps on the desktop that I have installed.

Ubuntu 20.04 with gnome. I think I have wine 6, or at least 5. I also have q4wine and winetricks installed.

So

  1. How can I resolve the error?
  2. How can I verify which version I'm running?

(Couldn't add any tag except 'wine')

Score:0
je flag

OK, got back to looking at this. I tried aptitude search wine and got everything wine related, including wine1.4 through wine1.7 all listed as "virtual," which in reading about virtual packages I take it these are supplied by one of the installed wine packages. If I run aptitude search wine|grep ^i I get:

i  q4wine - Qt GUI for WINE
i  wine-binfmt - Register Wine as the interpreter for Windows executables
i A wine-devel - WINE Is Not An Emulator - runs MS Windows programs
i A wine-devel-amd64 - WINE Is Not An Emulator - runs MS Windows programs
i A wine-devel-i386:i386 - WINE Is Not An Emulator - runs MS Windows programs
i  winehq-devel - WINE Is Not An Emulator - runs MS Windows programs
i  winetricks - simple tool to work around common problems in Wine

This is all a bit confusing. I guess the latest "version" I have is effectively wine1.7. Is this last one sometimes referred to as "wine 7?" I will keep digging to try to understand how wine works, and to get a better handle on using winetricks.

I still don't know the answer to why running wine --help opens 2 desktops, one with an error, and doesn't show me a version.

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.