Score:3

evince Document Viewer displays at double the actual size

in flag

When I look at a PDF of an A4 paper (or US Letter-sized paper), and set the zoom scale to 100%, the paper on the screen looks twice the actual width (42 cm instead of 21 cm). This happens with all PDF files. On the other hand, if I look at the file at 100% using Adobe Reader on Windows, it displays at the correct size. In both cases, my screen is HD at about 100 dpi. Why is evince wrong? Is there a setting to correct it?

Both my laptop (Ubuntu 20.04) and desktop (Ubuntu 21.10) have the same issue.

By comparison, Google Chrome displays the same PDF files correctly.

On my laptop:

$ evince --version
GNOME Document Viewer 3.36.10

On my desktop:

$ evince --version
GNOME Document Viewer 40.4
us flag
Is the issue present in alternative document viewers like Atril or Okular?
k314159 avatar
in flag
@ArchismanPanigrahi I don't have either of those viewers, but Google Chrome is another alternative viewer and that works fine, displaying it correctly at 100%. Adding this info to the question now.
us flag
Please check if it is present in atril (`sudo apt install atril`). That will help to decide whether the issue is in the backend (which both atril and evince use), or if it is a evince specific bug.
k314159 avatar
in flag
@ArchismanPanigrahi atril works correctly at 100% too, so it does indeed look like an evince-specific bug.
Score:0
in flag

This seems to be the same issue that was reported to the evince developers 2 years ago:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evince/-/issues/1335

It has not been fixed yet.

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.