Score:2

Is using snap and using "move to trash" mutually exclusive when using home directories on alternative partitions

us flag

I slowly started to accept that Ubuntu is forcing its users to use snap instead of apt (which I've used for 20+ years and like). Having been around for a few years, I'm offloading my home directories to an alternative partition, as this greatly facilitates system upgrades and backups. Symlinking them into /home has never been an issue -- well, until snap came along.

If I understand it correctly, then snap does not allow for home directories to be symlinks, but requires them to be mounted (-bind).

I could live with this, if it wouldn't break other things - but deleting objects to trash in directories mounted directories does not seem to work, as "rename doesn't cross mount points" ( https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70831 ).

Does anybody know a solution to this issue, I can't be the only one having it? Do I have to go back to apt and drop snap (I do actually like having the safety net of a trash)?

TIA

-- t

vanadium avatar
cn flag
So this still does not work when you have mount-bind your entire home directory elsewhere? Because then, the data to delete and the trash continue to live on the same partition, I would have expected that would continue to work.
us flag
It does, now, thanks for the comment. It was a bit more tricky, I've had several folders in home linked to yet other partitions for historical reasons and network drives. I guess I'll have to live with the fact that for those that have to remain I'll have to live without a trash.
mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.