Score:2

Is there any modern-day replacement for the Ubuntu Mini ISO?

ru flag

I'd like to use Ubuntu on my laptop, but as an experienced user, I would prefer to start off from a command line environment without removing all of the GNOME/GUI stuff. It seems that there used to be an "Ubuntu Mini" ISO which fits my purposes, but it has been discontinued in favor of a server installer that I have no use for. I would prefer to steer clear of Debian as my school does not officially support it. Do I have any options, or should I go the sad, unsupported Debian path? Many thanks!

user535733 avatar
cn flag
I think the question would be better without disparaging our hardworking friends at Debian. Everybody who uses Ubuntu benefits from their work.
Onkoe avatar
ru flag
@user535733 I'm terribly sorry if it seems that I'm saying anything bad about Debian! I love it quite a lot, but my school doesn't want to support it. :(
N0rbert avatar
zw flag
You have to use [focal's mini.iso](http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/focal/main/installer-amd64/current/legacy-images/netboot/mini.iso) and then upgrade it to the latest release.
cn flag
Something worth thinking about here - I traditionally used the mini ISO to cut down on my upfront download. Ubuntu server is the 'same' packages with different defaults , and there's nothing stopping you from building to your needs off that. IIRC it also has a minimal install option?
Score:7
cn flag

The Ubuntu developers have repeatedly said that the Netinstall (Mini) .iso image was a byproduct of their workflow of the time, not intended for widespread use, that it didn't provide the experience they wanted users to have, and that they wouldn't provide support for it.

(When I've seen Ubuntu Developers at work, I see them mostly use the Desktop and Server installers. Sometimes Ubuntu Base.)

So you were already using an unsupported install method.

The reason that the Netinstall .iso went away is that the installer development workflow changed. There's no longer that byproduct.

If a group of community members wants come together to restore the existence of the Mini.iso, they are completely welcome to take on that work. Ubuntu is open source and community-driven.

The Ubuntu 20.04 mini.iso still exists for a few more years.

Another option: Debian's mini.iso. You can edit the sources and dist-upgrade to use Ubuntu packages instead...which means you will be running Ubuntu.

The Ubuntu installer can be booted using PXE so you can customize your install. Or you can use a preseed file. Or a cloud-init file. There are many custom-install options.

Or you can just use Debian, regardless of what your school says. Ubuntu Developers strive to keep the differences between Ubuntu and Debian to a minimum (carrying patches costs resources!) Server users might not notice much difference.

And, finally, you can use Ubuntu Server. It is not bloated. It is fully-supported here, it is 100% real Ubuntu (to make your school happy), it's fast, it's easy to install, it's stable, and it's tested.

Score:5
zw flag

You still can use last available mini.iso of Ubuntu 20.04 LTS and then upgrade installed system to latest version.

Other possible installation method is to use debootstrap and then copy this system to somewhere. See this guide for Ubuntu MATE as an example.

Removal of mini.iso was bad idea. Canonical should follow their history and should respect user habbits. Shame on them! I'm still disappointed by this decision.

us flag
Is it possible to use the base image as the mini iso?
user535733 avatar
cn flag
@ArchismanPanigrahi not really -- Ubuntu base is not bootable and does not include a kernel. Folks who know how to overcome those obstacles don't really need a mini iso.
us flag
@user535733 I see
mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.