Score:0

Repartitioning issues

je flag

Good evening,

I am a total noob when it comes to linux/ubuntu and I'm a total disaster at it lol

I am trying to repartition my disk using a bootable usb drive.

My disk allocation looks like this (from GParted) enter image description here

I am trying to reallocate the free space next to dev/sda6 (to then allocate it really to dev/sda7, where I have my actual linux OS)

However when I try to repartition dev/sda6 I get this error: (source Gparted details)

GParted 1.0.0

configuration --enable-libparted-dmraid --enable-online-resize

libparted 3.3

======================================== Device: /dev/sda Model: ATA ST500LT012-1DG14 Serial: S3PM5J76 Sector size: 512 Total sectors: 976773168

Heads: 255 Sectors/track: 2 Cylinders: 1915241

Partition table: msdos

Partition Type Start End Flags Partition Name File System Label Mount Point /dev/sda1 Extended 4094 948453375 boot extended
/dev/sda5 Logical 4096 8392703 linux-swap
/dev/sda6 Logical 183248896 848977919 ntfs DATI
/dev/sda7 Logical 848979968 948453375 ext4

======================================== Device: /dev/sdb Model: Sony Storage Media Serial: none Sector size: 512 Total sectors: 15204352

Heads: 255 Sectors/track: 2 Cylinders: 29812

Partition table: none

Partition Type Start End Flags Partition Name File System Label Mount Point /dev/sdb Unpartitioned 0 15204351 iso9660 Ubuntu 20.04.5 LTS amd64

======================================== Move /dev/sda6 to the left and shrink it from 317.44 GiB to 292.60 GiB 00:00:02 ( ERROR )

calibrate /dev/sda6 00:00:01 ( SUCCESS )

path: /dev/sda6 (partition) start: 183248896 end: 848977919 size: 665729024 (317.44 GiB) check file system on /dev/sda6 for errors and (if possible) fix them 00:00:01 ( ERROR )

ntfsresize -i -f -v '/dev/sda6' 00:00:01 ( ERROR )

ntfsresize v2017.3.23AR.3 (libntfs-3g) Device name : /dev/sda6 NTFS volume version: 3.1 Cluster size : 4096 bytes Current volume size: 340853256704 bytes (340854 MB) Current device size: 340853260288 bytes (340854 MB) Checking for bad sectors ... Checking filesystem consistency ... 100.00 percent completed Accounting clusters ... Cluster accounting failed at 31694538 (0x1e39eca): extra cluster in $Bitmap Cluster accounting failed at 31694539 (0x1e39ecb): extra cluster in $Bitmap Cluster accounting failed at 31694540 (0x1e39ecc): extra cluster in $Bitmap Cluster accounting failed at 31694541 (0x1e39ecd): extra cluster in $Bitmap Cluster accounting failed at 31694542 (0x1e39ece): extra cluster in $Bitmap Filesystem check failed! Totally 5 cluster accounting mismatches. ERROR: NTFS is inconsistent. Run chkdsk /f on Windows then reboot it TWICE! The usage of the /f parameter is very IMPORTANT! No modification was and will be made to NTFS by this software until it gets repaired.

Can a kind soul help me interpret this and possibly guide me on how to fix this issue. It is really important to me to reallocate this free space, otherwise I soon won't be able to use my main partition (where my actual linux OS is)

Thank you very much for any help.

Have a wonderful day :)

oldfred avatar
cn flag
Best to only use Windows tools on NTFS. It usually needs chkdsk after any change & chkdsk can only be run from Windows. If you do not have Windows better to just back up data & convert drive gpt (which erases it) and create all new partitions of the size you want. You are moving a lot of data around and each move has risk. You must have backup before any major move like you are doing, anyway. Converting to or from GPT - must have good backups. http://www.rodsbooks.com/gdisk/mbr2gpt.html
ETisREAL avatar
je flag
Got it. Thank you for the heads up :)
I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.